> It's not the "post init" operations I'm worried about.
> It's that operations that were part of the init to the consumer are
> replayed from the changelog.
> Operations that occurred after the init starts, definitely still need to
> be replayed, and this makes sense.
> Lets say we have:
> 1 - insert A
> 2 - insert ou=B
> 3 - modrdn A under ou=B
> 4 - insert C
> xxxxxx <<-- We start to transmit the data here.
if we start the total update here, the supplier will send its RUV in the
start repl request, it will be set as RUV in the consumer after total
init is complete.
it skips to send the ruv entry
Are you sure? The behaviour that people are claiming to see would
contradict this behaviour. Certainly there have been a number of fixes
in URP related to replaying modrdn's and related changed after an online
> Does that make sense?
yes, and I think that is what it is doing now
I don't think it is ....
Red Hat, Brisbane