On 01/27/2011 08:33 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
>> 389-ds-base will be going into RHEL 6 at some point. We cannot
>> put it in EPEL6 because it would conflict. We are interested in
>> suggestions about how to provide binary packages on EL6.
> pardon my ignorance, but what would it clash with ?
389-ds-base in RHEL6.
And I assume that's in the Directory Server channel because on my
RHEL6 machine no 389-ds-base package exists and I do not have a
subscription to Redhat Directory service. Again working on my
assumption that means that RH directory service is using the same
package name as 389ds which would create the conflict. So either
389-ds packages are renamed or cannot go in EPEL, now its making sense.
is not _yet_ in RHEL6. Will be there in 6.1 or 6.2.
So is there some obstacle for the 389ds project to host its own yum repo?
than being a PITA? But if that is the only way . . .
389 users mailing list