Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
APAC Amabassadors' bi-weekly meeting on 2018-06-28 from 11:30:00 to 12:30:00 UTC
At fedora-meeting(a)irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is a friendly reminder for our bi-weekly meeting today at 11:30 hrs. UTC.
Don't forget to join: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
Thank you.
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/6412/
Hi,
since the transition to Pagure, I'm subscribed to
https://pagure.io/ambassadors-emea/swag_requests
I filter e-mail from that Pagure to a specific e-mail folder.
But if somebody mentions me like this:
https://pagure.io/ambassadors-emea/swag_requests/issue/9#comment-481293
Or if there is generally an issue of mine, it gets lost in all the other
Pagure e-mail. I don't have the energy to go trough all and hence I
appear nonresponsive on the EMEA Ambassadors Pagure.
Is there a trick?
Thanks,
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
Hi all,
I filed an issue here:
https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/3368 Add "x-pagure-reason:" header to
e-mail notifications
Add your thoughts, and maybe we can find someone interested enough to
implement it :)
--
Aleksandra Fedorova
bookwar
Anyone interested in bringing Fedora topics that may be of interest to
the CentOS community to this conference?
----- Forwarded message from Rich Bowen <rbowen(a)redhat.com> -----
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:21:41 -0400
> From: Rich Bowen <rbowen(a)redhat.com>
> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org>
> Cc: "centos-promo(a)centos.org" <centos-promo(a)centos.org>
> Subject: [CentOS-devel] CFP for Dojo @ DevConf.us closes this weekend
> X-Bogo25: H 3.14881e-09
>
> The CentOS Dojo at DevConf.us is rushing up on us, and I'd like to
> have a speaker schedule published by early next week.
>
> If you are considering submitting a talk, please do it NOW, so that
> we don't have to consider canceling this event. Thank you.
>
> Event details: https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/DevConfUS2018
> Call for papers: https://goo.gl/forms/kKta9IasJGNxIVR53
> DevConf information: http://devconf.us/
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com
> @CentOSProject // @rbowen
> 859 351 9166
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel(a)centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EMEA Ambassadors on 2018-06-19 from 19:00:00 to 20:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meeting(a)irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
EMEA Ambassadors regular meeting.
* Meeting Agenda:
- Roll Call
- Announcements
- Requests
- Ambassadors Schedule
- Events
- Action items from previous meetings
- Open Floor
If you have any requests that need to be discussed during the meeting, make sure to file a ticket on pagure.
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/8688/
In today's APAC Ambassadors meeting we were talking about how tickets were
not moving through the system despite ambassadors ready to do events.
We've tried a few things in the past, but it has been super hard to get
real-time meetings working or to get ticket voting to happen in all cases.
Questions seems to block events from being approved, even when the question
is about details not related to the approvals.
You can read the conversation here:
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-06-14/apac_ambassador…
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-06-14/apac_ambassador…
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-06-14/apac_ambassador…
The end result of this was to use APAC as the leading edge of the Mindshare
movement. The proposal is to ask Mindshare to start working with APAC
events/requests immediately. This provides the following benefits:
1. APAC gets a group of people to help move tickets through a process
and it unblocks ambassadors to do what they do best -- FANTASTIC FEDORA
EVENTS!
2. Mindshare gets a queue of real requests to apply the strategy they
are working on too. This will expose gaps and holes.
3. It gives Mindshare the ability to generate their procedures as they
work on translating their proposal into procedures using real issues.
The request in this email is to find out if both groups are willing to do
this.
Mindshare can review this in their next meeting on Monday. This is opened
in their ticket queue as: https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/26
Because APAC ambassadors is a large group across many timezones and doesn't
meet as frequently, let's use a modified lazy consensus model. Let's get
some +1s in the Mindshare ticket to indicate sentiment and address any -1s
to identify challenges and respond to them. I strongly encourage anyone
who has concerns to raise them and to note what could be done to solve
their concern as well solve the overall issues.
Please continue the conversation in ticket
https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/26
regards,
bex on behalf of the APAC Ambassadors Meeting
--
Brian (bex) Exelbierd | bexelbie(a)redhat.com | bex(a)pobox.com
Fedora Community Action & Impact Coordinator
@bexelbie | http://www.winglemeyer.org