jflory7 added a new comment to an issue you are following:
@lailah I read it that @markdude was suggesting to widen the scope beyond only three
universities, or to consider universities that aren't necessarily well-known (like
community colleges). I agree and disagree with the comment for a couple reasons.
I disagree with focusing on more than three Campus Ambassadors per region at once, in the
beginning. I think it's important for us to start with a well-defined scope and work
closely with three Campus Ambassadors in each region, so we can work closely with these
individuals, figure out what works and what doesn't, and then take what we learn into
a model that can be repeated. _Then_, we should be able to work with more Campus
Ambassadors at a larger scale.
I agree that the scope doesn't have to be limited to a well-known university. I think
what universities we choose to engage with will depend on what Ambassadors we have where,
like the [campus presence
list shows (although this is likely outdated by now).
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email