arm May 2018

arm@lists.fedoraproject.org

10 participants
14 discussions

[RaspberryPI 3B] [unicorn Hat] [how to configure spi]
by Pierre-Francois RENARD 30 Aug '18

30 Aug '18

Hello I am running raspberry pi3B and with lastest fedora 28 (with kernel 4.16.0-300.fc28.aarch64) I read from the unicorn Hat that I need to activate SPI using raspi-config ( for raspbian only) So I tried to do it manually .. and that's when everything did not go so well :) I understood that I have to tune /boot/efi/config.txt file adding device_tree_param=spi=on I guess I have also to add a dtoverlay line but I don't which one ... Thanks

6 28

aarch64 copr?
by Avi Kivity 14 Jun '18

14 Jun '18

Hello, What are the prospects for getting aarch64 copr? Copr is very useful for bringing bleeding edge Fedora packages to CentOS/RHEL users.

3 3

Fedora28 / dnf upgrade / no more booting
by Pierre-Francois RENARD 04 Jun '18

04 Jun '18

Hello guys, I am having a strange issue :) fresh install of F28 aarch64, dnf -y upgrade, reboot leads me to a none booting system. looking at the console (HDMI) I can see the boot process and it is stucked on starting the root filesystem (" A start job is running for dev-mapp...2droot.devices (2mins 1s / no limit)") 1/ without any dnf upgrade, the system is rebooting perfectly 2/ I can wait more than 10 min with the same result any hints? :) Thanks

3 4

Hikey board (620) with Fedora 28 minimal cannot boot
by Zamir SUN 02 Jun '18

02 Jun '18

Hi, Today I am trying my HikeyBoard (620) with Fedora-Minimal-28-1.1.aarch64.raw.xz. It simply cannot boot. I confirmed the xz image has the same hash as is shown on the mirror. I used the following command to write to my TF card. xzcat Fedora-Minimal-28-1.1.aarch64.raw.xz | sudo dd status=progress bs=4M of=/dev/mmcblk0 The system failed in dracut init queue timeout, with a warning "Warning: /dev/disk/by-uuid/9a926ac9-5938-4539-bb79-72f87b36095f does not exist " However I confirmed the uuid is right for my partition. Besides, I cannot type anything via minicon to it so I cannot really debug more right now. I am posting the last block of message via UART. So anyone have some hints for this? Thanks in advance! (P.S. Fedora 27 works fine on my hikey board). [ 222.639468] dracut-initqueue[468]: Warning: dracut-initqueue timeout - starts [ 222.639909] dracut-initqueue[468]: Warning: Could not boot. Starting Setup Virtual Console... [ OK [ 222.716760] audit: type=1130 audit(1520288415.819:14): pid=1 uid=0 au' ] Started Setup [ 222.738436] audit: type=1131 audit(1520288415.819:15): pid=1' Virtual Console. Starting Dracut Emergency Shell... [ 222.825449] audit: type=1131 audit(1520288415.929:16): pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294' Warning: /dev/disk/by-uuid/9a926ac9-5938-4539-bb79-72f87b36095f does not exist Generating "/run/initramfs/rdsosreport.txt" [ 222.897318] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req 400000H) [ 222.956555] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req 1000000) [ 222.967237] print_req_error: 6 callbacks suppressed [ 222.967243] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1 [ 222.985808] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 0 [ 222.991640] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1 [ 223.001405] Buffer I/O error on dev mmcblk0, logical block 0, async page read [ 223.032457] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req 400000H) [ 223.089436] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req 1000000) [ 223.100132] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1 [ 223.114267] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 0 [ 223.120128] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1 [ 223.129994] Buffer I/O error on dev mmcblk0, logical block 0, async page read [ 223.176307] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 0 [ 223.182146] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1 [ 223.211348] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req 400000H) [ 223.268935] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req 1000000) [ 223.279748] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 1 [ 223.285597] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 2 [ 223.313471] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req 400000H) [ 223.373025] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req 1000000) [ 223.442453] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req 400000H) [ 223.499139] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req 1000000) [ 223.533285] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req 400000H) [ 223.592543] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req 1000000) [ 223.663611] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req 400000H) [ 223.723301] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req 1000000) [ 223.757851] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 24800000Hz (slot req 400000H) [ 223.817927] mmc_host mmc0: Bus speed (slot 0) = 99200000Hz (slot req 1000000) -- Ziqian SUN (Zamir) GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E Want to know more about Fedora? Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/

4 7

couple of questions
by Michael Ciccarelli 30 May '18

30 May '18

I have a raspberry pi 3b+ and I have a few questions 1) I try to boot the Fedora 28 aarch64 raw image I run into an issue with the "Rx: failed to receive: -5".. I believe someone has a bug report opened already.. any idea on when this might be fixed? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573261 I can only boot the armhfp release as of right now. I guess I'm just looking for more detail about this issue. 2) if I want to network boot and I can't use aarch64 because of the above issue what could I use for the boot file for armhfp? I'm familiar with booting x86 systems and you can typically use pxelinux.0 to start the process. If you could provide a download link that would be great on instructions on how to create the boot file would be fine. thanks, Mike

2 3

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting
by pwhalen＠redhat.com 27 May '18

27 May '18

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2018-05-29 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting. More information available at: [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM](https://fedoraproject.org… Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9202/

1 0

EspressoBin and systemd
by Timothy Krantz 24 May '18

24 May '18

Hi, I know the espressobin is not a currently supported board. That being said, I am happily running a Fedora 27 root filesystem on one with a self compiled kernel. Fedora 28 root filesystem halts at boot with system freezing execution. Fedora rawhide boots ok. Looking into differences between 28 and rawhide I see the following: Fedora rawhide /usr/lib/systemd/systemd --version systemd 238 +PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA -APPARMOR +SMACK +SYSVINIT +UTMP +LIBCRYPTSETUP +GCRYPT +GNUTLS +ACL +XZ +LZ4 +SECCOMP +BLKID +ELFUTILS +KMOD +IDN2 -IDN +PCRE2 default-hierarchy=hybrid ls -l /usr/lib/systemd/systemd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1735840 May 11 07:05 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd dnf list systemd Installed Packages systemd.aarch64 238-8.git0e0aa59.fc29 @updates Fedora 28 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd --version systemd 238 +PAM +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA -APPARMOR +SMACK +SYSVINIT +UTMP +LIBCRYPTSETUP +GCRYPT +GNUTLS +ACL +XZ +LZ4 +SECCOMP +BLKID +ELFUTILS +KMOD +IDN2 -IDN +PCRE2 default-hierarchy=hybrid ls -l /usr/lib/systemd/systemd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1735240 May 11 07:08 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd dnf list systemd systemd.aarch64 238-8.git0e0aa59.fc28 @updates Which looks pretty darn similar to me, down to the git revision. So, I am wondering where I would begin to look as to why one works and one fails (on the espressobin). Would I grab the source RPM's and see if there is a difference in compiler flags? Or maybe just a difference in compiler versions? Is it likely that the Fedora 28 version actually has a patch or patches that are not yet in rawhidhttps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883690e? Is there any chance that this issue is related to this debian issue : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883690 Thanks for any input. This is NOT a big problem for me. Tim Krantz

2 1

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting
by pwhalen＠redhat.com 20 May '18

20 May '18

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2018-05-22 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status meeting. More information available at: [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM](https://fedoraproject.org… Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9202/

1 0

Re: armhfp builder instability
by Florian Weimer 15 May '18

15 May '18

On 05/15/2018 01:34 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> wrote: >>> Lately, I've seen quite a few spurious build failures. Random SIGBUS is >>> particularly common, and gcc reports that it cannot reproduce the SIGBUS in >>> a second compilation, which usually points to a kernel/hardware issue. >>> >>> The latest problem was a hang during a build (on >>> buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedoraproject.org), with this kernel: >>> >>> Linux buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedoraproject.org 4.16.6-302.fc28.armv7hl+lpae #1 >>> SMP Tue May 1 23:15:35 UTC 2018 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux >>> >>> This affects multiple builders, so I suspect a kernel issue, not dying >>> hardware because AFAIK, the machines are independent. >>> >>> The issue also affects copying out the log files for Koji, so they probably >>> do not show the actual place of the hang. >> >> There's a stability issue post upgrade, the upgrades moved the >> underlying hypervisors to RHEL 7.5 and the build VMs to Fedora 28 at >> the same time, the issue is known and is being investigated/worked >> upon. >> > > As I'm facing what seems to be the very same issue > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26957996), I'd > like to ask whether there's a ticket/bug/issue opened for this that I > could follow and get some notification when it's solved. It turns out there already was a kernel bug, which I just made public: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576593 Thanks, Florian

1 0

armhfp builder instability
by Florian Weimer 15 May '18

15 May '18

Lately, I've seen quite a few spurious build failures. Random SIGBUS is particularly common, and gcc reports that it cannot reproduce the SIGBUS in a second compilation, which usually points to a kernel/hardware issue. The latest problem was a hang during a build (on buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedoraproject.org), with this kernel: Linux buildvm-armv7-07.arm.fedoraproject.org 4.16.6-302.fc28.armv7hl+lpae #1 SMP Tue May 1 23:15:35 UTC 2018 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux This affects multiple builders, so I suspect a kernel issue, not dying hardware because AFAIK, the machines are independent. The issue also affects copying out the log files for Koji, so they probably do not show the actual place of the hang. Thanks, Florian

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

arm May 2018