October 2017 - Atomic Working Group

[atomic-wg] Issue #363: Overhaul list of members, Quorum Rules
by Josh Berkus 16 Jan '18

16 Jan '18

jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` The current list of members, carried over from the Cloud SIG, is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Atomic_WG#Working_Group_Members_and_Points_o… Things we need to change: 1. Who should we remove? Are jsmith and nzwulfin active anymore? 2. Who needs to be added? Jlebon? ashcrow? QUORUM ISSUE: We currently list meeting quorum as 51% of all members. With our open membership, though, that means that we need at least 11 people at a Fedora Atomic meeting to make decisions. We need to either lower that threshold (I suggest six) or we need to restrict membership in the WG. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/363

10 29

[atomic-wg] Issue #360: Decide strategy for including container runtimes in Atomic Host
by Josh Berkus 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Currently, we ship docker in the base image for Fedora Atomic Host. With the release of CRI-O, as well as the issues around docker versions, one possible solution is to ship only runc with the base Atomic Host, and make container runtimes installable as system containers. If we don't move docker to a system container, there's a strong argument to also ship CRI-O as part of the base image. Arguments in favor of System Containers for CRs: * minimizes the base system image * helps deal with docker/containerd versioning issues * doesn't require users to ship container runtimes they don't want * consistent with our general modularity approach * puts CRI-O/docker on a separate upgrade cycle, which can help around kube/openshift updates * allows community to add other runtimes if they want (e.g. Rkt) Arguments against using System Containers for CRs: * extra step (or two) for new user startup * total disk size for atomic + cri-o + docker will actually be larger * not sure if all things docker work as a system container * puts docker/CRI-O on a separate upgrade cycle, which could break around kernel updates Discuss! `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/360

6 10

[atomic-wg] Issue #356: Article For F27: Fedora 27 Atomic Features
by Josh Berkus 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Article Title: Fedora 27 Atomic Feature Roundup Deadline: October 30 Priority: Normal Publication: Fedora Community Blog This should be a round-up of the features in Fedora 27 Atomic, for a general audience that hasn't followed Atomic for the last 6 months. Should cover features from the talking points briefly and link off to other articles. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/356

2 5

[atomic-wg] Issue #357: Article for F27: Updated Installing Kubernetes Doc
by Josh Berkus 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Title: Installing Kubernetes on Fedora 27 Atomic Deadline: November 15 Publication: Project Atomic Blog, Docs Priority: Low This should be based on the F26 article from Jason Brooks, updated to show the correct options and terminal sessions for F27. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/357

3 3

[atomic-wg] Issue #359: Article for F27: System Containers
by Josh Berkus 05 Dec '17

05 Dec '17

jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Article Title: Installing [Docker, Etcd, Flannel, something] In a System Container Deadline: Dec 1 Publication: Project Atomic Blog Priority: Nice To Have This article would be intended to show off the improved system containers, atomic CLI and FLIBS system containers. In it, the writer would step through installing some piece of software other than Kubernetes which is available from FLIBS in a system container, such as an alternate version of Docker. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/359

3 5

[atomic-wg] Issue #369: Article for F27: Atomic Host availability on multi-arch
by Sinny Kumari 16 Nov '17

16 Nov '17

sinnykumari reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Article Title: Atomic Host availability on multi-arch Deadline: 5th November (considering F27 release is on 7th November) Publication: Project Atomic Blog Priority: Medium This will focus on Atomic Host availability on ppc64le and aarch64 arches. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/369

2 9

[atomic-wg] Issue #365: Article for F27: Fedora 26->27 Atomic Host Upgrade Guide
by Dusty Mabe 15 Nov '17

15 Nov '17

dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Article Title: Fedora 26->27 Atomic Host Upgrade Guide Deadline: November 5th (whenever f27 release day is) Publication: Project Atomic Blog Priority: Critical Similar to the one we did for [f25->f26](http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2017/08/fedora-atomic-25-to-26-upgrade/). We can also update people with the 'rolling release' plans here. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/365

1 4

[atomic-wg] Issue #346: re-evaluate atomic working group meeting time
by Dusty Mabe 09 Nov '17

09 Nov '17

dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` I received a comment from @eslobodo and @ttomecek saying that the current meeting time is bad for them but they would like to attend. While meeting times are hard since we are trying to accommodate a lot of different schedules, let's attempt to find a time earlier in the day that can work for everyone. Some things to note: - we have contributors that span from india as well as the west coast US. It is hard to find a time that works for everyone but we can try to find a time where most can attend (though not at an ideal time for them). - our meeting does not move with daylight savings. This is is useful because most countries do not observe daylight savings. We stick to a single UTC time year round. I have created a doodle for us to vote on times that work best for us https://doodle.com/poll/asf23abkh666k6r7. The doodle should allow you to select your time zone. The doodle was created for mid november so it should be **after** any daylight savings time changes have happened. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/346

3 10

[atomic-wg] Issue #352: enabling quota support on root XFS filesystem
by Dusty Mabe 09 Nov '17

09 Nov '17

dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` @vgoyal [recommends](https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/281#comment-471786) we should enable quota support on our root filesystem if we want to use overlay2 on it by default. We need to investigate doing this and see if there are any implications. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/352

2 6

[atomic-wg] Issue #353: Fedora 27 Talking Points
by Jan Kurik 07 Nov '17

07 Nov '17

jkurik reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` As we are getting closer to the F27 Final release, I would like to ask members of the Atomic WG to revisit and finalize Talking Points for the F27 Atomic release. This helps not only the community Marketing team, but also Ambassadors who arrange release parties and evangelize the release worldwide. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_talking_points#Fedora_Atomic Thank you, Jan `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/353

3 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Atomic Working Group October 2017