dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
ok in Fedora 27 and rawhide right now we default to overlayfs on root filesystem. The root filesystem is automatically extended on cloud images to fill all available space (this can be overridden using cloud-init).
[Early in this ticket](https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/281#comment-443955) we discussed:
- 1 large filesystem by default
- Ability to easily move container storage to another filesystem on system setup.
The first is covered (it is the default) and the 2nd can be done using `CONTAINER_ROOT_LV*` options to container-storage-setup.
The only part I don't think we've covered is the [Storage for system containers](https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-April/msg00031.html) discussion. In the case where we move container storage to another filesystem we aren't doing this for system containers.
I've opened a new issue to pick up this topic and carry it forward: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/350
Closing this ticket since most of the work is done.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/281
dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
This started as a [discussion](https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-April/msg00031.html) on atomic-devel some time ago. We recently overhauled the default for our storage (switch to default to overlay2 in F26 and [switch to overlay2 on our rootfs as default in F27](https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/281)), however we need to still consider consolidating container storage among docker/oci/system containers so that whenever we do configure **container storage** to be on separate filesystems (via `CONTAINER_ROOT_LV*` options to container-storage-setup) we cover them all.
There are some positives and negatives to doing this. Here are a few:
- `+` container storage is configured for all container runtimes. an admin does not have to configure/consider the storage use for each of them
- `-` if we put system container storage on a different filesystem then we won't share storage with host ostree.
Let's continue the discussion on this topic here.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/350
The issue: `bodhi creating ostrees using pungi` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `maxamillion` by dustymabe.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/300
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@maxamillion has volunteered to pick up this work from me. :beers:
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/300
The status of the issue: `[Test Day] Proposed Dates for F27 Atomic Test Day` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/322
torsava added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@ttomecek I'm just about to leave on PTO so I don't have time to look into this issue, apologies. I could look into it in two weeks' time if it's still relevant.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/217
The status of the issue: `Concerns related to enabling Atomic Host CloudImages compose in Rawhide for multi-arches` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/299
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> Ok so I did open a ticket with our IT and will handle information gathering, etc, etc. I can't promise a miracle (and for tracking purpose, our internal ticket number is "INC0617469")
thanks so much @misc - I really appreciate it. If possible feel free to add me to the ticket and I'll provide any information I can to help make this successful.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/325