walters opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following:
``
f27 backports from master
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/98
walters opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following:
``
post: Be rofiles-fuse compatible
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/97
cverna opened a new pull-request against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
Update meeting-people.txt with cverna
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/pull-request/400
sanja opened a new pull-request against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
Add sanja to meeting-people.txt
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/pull-request/398
smilner reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
When the group can not come to a 100% (or whatever percentage is deemed enough) consensus we could have an in chat +1/-1 vote called by the meeting leader. This could be for anything from continuing a discussion on a topic, to moving the conversation to pagure, to making a decision in the meeting. If the +1/-1 result ends in a positive integer then the proposal passes.
* +1, -1, +1, +1 = 2 == PASS
* +1, -1, +1, -1 = 0 == FAIL
* -1, -1, +1, -1 = -1 == FAIL
Calling a vote would be at the discretion of the meeting leader and should generally called when:
* A clear decision is required
* The conversation is not leading to a conclusion/actionable result
* A barometer of the room on a topic is needed
If an item **requires** an outcome yet the team is unable to agree on one via the voting process the issue would then be escalated to the proper Fedora committee/working group.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/377
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> the content is already in the repo in the master branch: all that is needed now is to put the dockerfile to f27 branch and build it
yes, who can do that?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/206
ttomecek added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
the content is already in the repo in the master branch: all that is needed now is to put the dockerfile to f27 branch and build it
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/206
walters opened a new pull-request against the project: `fedora-atomic` that you are following:
``
jigdo spec: Rename, add new metadata key
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/96