dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> Let's do the simple solution first then :)
> stable in rawhide and stable-1 in fedora stable
some sort of policy like this would be good to put in a readme over in https://pagure.io/atomic/kubernetes-sig
Since 1.7 is now in rawhide and we have the above policy should we leave this issue open?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/304
The status of the issue: `Identify group of people interested in maintaining kubernetes` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe.
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
On 07/12/2017 12:56 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> We recently changed the ref for atomic host in Fedora 26 to be
> `atomic-host` rather than `docker-host`.
>
> Similarly we'd like to change the name of the file within the repo [1]
> from fedora-atomic-docker-host.json to fedora-atomic-host.json.
>
> If anyone is pulling from this repo and building trees please update
> your files to use the new filename for the master and f26 branches.
>
> We have temporarily left a symlink for compatibility. I'll be removing
> that in a week or two and updating this mail when that happens.
>
> Dusty
>
> [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/blob/70e320ccb557ffd7f1bb14d6a6f0748843dc3d…
>
The symlink has been removed in the following PRs:
[1] https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/67
[2] https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/68
jflory7 added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Hey all, just thought I'd add that I'm interested in helping use and test k8s on Fedora. Still getting introduced to everything, but this is definitely something I'd be interested in helping with where possible! I'm subscribed to the kubernetes-sig repo now.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/287
sinnykumari added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
>
> Does adding reqpart in fedora-atomic kickstart seem legit? If yes, I'd like to create a pull request for the same.
>
> Seems legit, although we may want to wait for the anaconda support for $basearch in ostreesetup line before we do this.
Sure.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/299
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> Does adding reqpart in fedora-atomic kickstart seem legit? If yes, I'd like to create a pull request for the same.
Seems legit, although we may want to wait for the anaconda support for $basearch in ostreesetup line before we do this. @walters is there an open issue for that against anaconda?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/299
sinnykumari added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
>
> we need to experiment with reqpart and see if it does the right thing for atomic - are you able to run imagefactory locally and experiment?
> Haven't checked how reqpart works, will look into it.
>
> Yes, we can use reqpart in the fedora-atomic.ks to auto create architecture specific partitions. Image created and ran successfully with this change on ppc64le and x86_64 locally.
Does adding reqpart in fedora-atomic kickstart seem legit? If yes, I'd like to create a pull request for the same.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/299