mattdm reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Knock on wood, the beta is getting signed-off on tomorrow. I'll need to get a press release and the Fedora announcement ready. What do we want to say about Atomic Host? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/342
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` FYI: F26 talking points are here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_talking_points#Fedora_Atomic
We should mention something about the change to the storage layout. From what I remember we now just configure overlay2 on your root filesystem (on LVM by default) and do not set up separate storage (i.e. separate LV) for docker. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/342
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` What about versions of Kubernetes & Docker? Also what about other tools like buildah etc.? What are we shipping? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/342
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Particularly since it's the beta, we should call out anything we want people to test to make sure is working when we flip to F27 base at GA.
In addition of course to anything new and exciting. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/342
jberkus added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Ideas, as changes since 26:
* New system containers for Kubernetes, Docker, and OpenShift, allowing you to install the version you want. * By default, installs one big volume with OverlayFS2, instead of requiring partitioning for containers. * Local rpm-ostree layering for ad-hoc or single-system package install.
Questions:
A. Have we switched to a single OSTree for rolling upgrade? B. Is built-in Kubernetes still there? C. What versions of what things are installed? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/342
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Thanks @jberkus. Are the system containers in FLIBS or somewhere else? How would one enable them? Is the OpenShift version Origin 3.6? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/342
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` ok here is a stab at the talking points:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Dustymabe/random ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/342
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` That's awesome. Thanks dusty -- that will definitely do. If there's more polish for this by final, so much the better.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/342
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` closing this ticket since beta is finalized. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/342
The status of the issue: `Urgent: need talking points for F27 beta Atomic Host` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe.
atomic@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Dusty Mabe -
Josh Berkus
-
Matthew Miller