Any objections against applying the attached patch? It makes mach quieter and gets rid of the spinner crap that ends up in current build logs.
This junk appears to make browsers (at least Firefox) not to open the build log but to ask for an app to handle it even though it's sent as text/plain. For example: http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/failed/development/uudeview/0.5.20-6/x86_64/u...
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 15:59 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Any objections against applying the attached patch? It makes mach quieter and gets rid of the spinner crap that ends up in current build logs.
This junk appears to make browsers (at least Firefox) not to open the build log but to ask for an app to handle it even though it's sent as text/plain. For example: http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/failed/development/uudeview/0.5.20-6/x86_64/u...
I'd much rather kill all the spinner crap from mach and dispense and still get other info back from mach (ie: w/o -q)
I don't much see the point of the spinner stuff for what we're doing and while I acknowledge it is cute it's not useful.
-sv
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org