Hi Folks, some new mach+yum pkgs are up: http://linux.duke.edu/~skvidal/mach/pkgs/
Changes: - fix for traceback when rebuilding srpm when spec file in srpm is mode 600 - add in: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Apr 17 2003 fd -> ../proc/self/fd crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 7 Dec 11 15:49 full crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 3 Dec 11 15:49 null crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 5, 2 Dec 11 15:49 ptmx crw-r--r-- 1 root root 1, 8 Dec 11 15:49 random crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 5, 0 Dec 11 15:49 tty crw-r--r-- 1 root root 1, 9 Dec 11 15:49 urandom crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 5 Dec 11 15:49 zero
to /dev in chroots to make sure builds work :)
- make the command 'mach yum' actually work
At this point I'll probably check the code in as 'extras-buildsys-temp' or something equally as obviously named. Can anyone here tell me if I can even make new modules in /cvs/fedora?
-sv
At this point I'll probably check the code in as 'extras-buildsys-temp' or something equally as obviously named. Can anyone here tell me if I can even make new modules in /cvs/fedora?
We should include this into Fedora Extras as rpm as well to get more people using it.
greetings,
Florian La Roche
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 09:52 +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
At this point I'll probably check the code in as 'extras-buildsys-temp' or something equally as obviously named. Can anyone here tell me if I can even make new modules in /cvs/fedora?
We should include this into Fedora Extras as rpm as well to get more people using it.
we need to make a decision about separation or integration with upstream mach cvs, esp wrt mach3.
if we're not going to merge back to mach2 head (which notably could take a lot of work b/c I've not focused on making that easy with these patches) I'd rather rename this something innocuous so we don't annoy thomas with bugs from this version.
-sv
seth vidal wrote:
we need to make a decision about separation or integration with upstream mach cvs, esp wrt mach3.
if we're not going to merge back to mach2 head (which notably could take a lot of work b/c I've not focused on making that easy with these patches) I'd rather rename this something innocuous so we don't annoy thomas with bugs from this version.
yach?
Warren
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 03:57 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 09:52 +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
At this point I'll probably check the code in as 'extras-buildsys-temp' or something equally as obviously named. Can anyone here tell me if I can even make new modules in /cvs/fedora?
We should include this into Fedora Extras as rpm as well to get more people using it.
we need to make a decision about separation or integration with upstream mach cvs, esp wrt mach3.
if we're not going to merge back to mach2 head (which notably could take a lot of work b/c I've not focused on making that easy with these patches) I'd rather rename this something innocuous so we don't annoy thomas with bugs from this version.
-sv
I finally got a chance to install and play around with the extras- buildsys-temp code. There were a couple hiccups, but it didn't take too long before I could start building packages. I hope to be able to pitch in and help out some with the upcoming build system work.
I have a couple questions. First, are other people running into the "Bad owner/group" error when running mach with a uid != 500? http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php? thread_id=4173173&forum_id=35925 describes the issue more. I got around it by creating a dummy user with uid equal to 500, but I'm wondering if I should try to get a real fix in upstream. That brings me to my next question: are there any more thoughts on the separation of integration of the hacked version of mach with the upstream version?
Cheers -- Dennis
I finally got a chance to install and play around with the extras- buildsys-temp code. There were a couple hiccups, but it didn't take too long before I could start building packages. I hope to be able to pitch in and help out some with the upcoming build system work.
As soon as I finish off a couple more bits i'm going to check in my first shot at the automation mechanisms that we discussed last week. It's not beautiful but it should help use churn out packages faster and give us a place to work from.
-sv
buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Dennis Gregorovic -
Florian La Roche -
seth vidal -
Warren Togami