I just had a successful build with all unit tests passing.
In order to do this, I needed the version of buildr I created, and
called buildr from the command line with:
buildr -f buildfile.new -r localbuild.rb package
localbuild.rb is checked in, but I haven't added my version of the
buildfile: I'll attach it here. I've tried to keep the versions of the
RPMs I use consistant with the ones from the original buildfile. The
biggest diversion is quartz, which has a very heavy dependency list, and
on versions of jakarta-commons that are not compatible with the rest of
the project. This, I've used a much older version of quartz. If this
proves to be a problem, I can battle through getting the more recent one
built.
These are the JPackage RPMS I have installed. These is a mix of 5 and 6
in there.
jakarta-commons-logging-1.1.1-2.jpp6.noarch
jboss-transaction-1.0.1-api-5.0.1-2.jpp6.noarch
jakarta-commons-httpclient-3.1-1.jpp6.noarch
geronimo-specs-poms-1.2-13.jpp5.noarch
jboss-javaee-poms-5.0.1-2.jpp6.noarch
geronimo-specs-poms-1.2-13.jpp6.noarch
jdom-1.1.1-2.jpp6.noarch
hibernate3-ejb-persistence-3.0-api-1.0.2-4.jpp6.noarch
aopalliance-1.0-5.jpp6.noarch
antlr-2.7.6-7.jpp6.noarch
dom4j-1.6.1-12.jpp6.noarch
asm-1.5.3-7.jpp5.noarch
jakarta-commons-logging-jboss-1.1-4.jpp5.noarch
hibernate3-entitymanager-3.4.0-2.7.jpp6.noarch
jboss-common-core-2.2.14-2.jpp6.noarch
glassfish-javamail-1.4.0-4.jpp6.noarch
hibernate3-annotations-3.4.0-1.4.jpp6.noarch
plexus-containers-component-api-1.0-0.a32.3.jpp5.noarch
geronimo-ejb-3.0-api-1.2-13.jpp5.noarch
geronimo-jta-1.1-api-1.2-13.jpp6.noarch
jboss-common-logging-spi-2.1.0-2.jpp6.noarch
glassfish-jaf-1.1.0-6.jpp6.noarch
hibernate3-commons-annotations-3.1.0-3.jpp6.noarch
jakarta-commons-modeler-2.0-5.jpp5.noarch
cglib-2.2-4.jpp6.noarch
I think the glassfish ones are required for building quartz, and are not
strictly speaking necessary.
This is an incomplete list of the ones I've built by hand:
guice-throwingproviders-2.0-4.young.noarch
guice-assistedinject-2.0-4.young.noarch
jakarta-commons-cli-1.2-4.young.noarch
jta-1.1-3.young.noarch
persistence-api-1.0-3.young.noarch
hibernate-commons-annotations-3.3.0.ga-1.young.noarch
jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.4-3.young.noarch
servlet-api-2.5-3.young.noarch
jakarta-commons-collections-testframework-3.2.1-5.young.x86_64
guice-multibindings-2.0-2.young.noarch
commons-dbcp-1.4-3.young.noarch
hibernate3-validator-3.1.0-4.young.noarch
resteasy-guice-1.2.1.GA-4.young.noarch
hibernate-tools-3.2.4.GA-3.young.noarch
guice-2.0-5.young.noarch
jakarta-commons-collections-3.2.1-5.young.x86_64
guice-servlet-2.0-2.young.noarch
emma-2.0-0.5312.5.fc12.noarch
I only recently started tagging my builds with young, so I have others
that were built with fc12.
Here is a list of RPMS I've forced in with --nodeps.
freemarker-2.3.15-1.jpp5.noarch.rpm
jdom-1.1.1-2.jpp6.noarch.rpm
dom4j-1.6.1-12.jpp6.noarch.rpm
jakarta-commons-modeler-2.0-5.jpp5.noarch.rpm
quartz-1.5.2-7.fc12.noarch.rpm
geronimo-ejb-3.0-api-1.2-13.jpp5.noarch.rpm
On 04/27/2010 02:49 PM, Jesus Rodriguez wrote:
> Adam,
>
> I'm in the process of writing a script that will convert
> your MySpecs tree into something I can use tito with to submit
> the pkgs into koji.rhndev.
>
> Basically the structure would be one dir per project, for example,
> emma would be turned into:
>
> MySpecs/emma
> MySpecs/emma/emma.spec
> MySpecs/emma/emma-2.0.5312-build_xml.patch
> MySpecs/emma/emma-2.0.5312-code-source.patch
> MySpecs/emma/emma-2.0.5312-dependencies_xml.patch
> MySpecs/emma/emma-2.0.5312-no-javac-target.patch
> MySpecs/emma/emma-2.0.5312-no-version-stamp-tool.patch
> MySpecs/emma/emma-2.0.5312.pom
> MySpecs/emma/emma-2.0.5312-src.zip
> MySpecs/emma/emma_ant-2.0.5312.pom
>
> In the process of writing my script I found that some of the
> Sources / Patches referenced by the spec files are NOT in
> your SOURCES directory.
>
> For example,
>
> ls: cannot access SOURCES/buildr-buildpath.patch: No such file or directory
> ls: cannot access SOURCES/heckle-local.patch: No such file or directory
>
> Do these need to be checked in? where are they?
>
> The reason behind what I'm doing is very similar to the thirdparty
> tree we built for spacewalk. It allowed us to manage third party
> packages which were not in fedora/rhel that we needed in koji.rhndev
> to build spacewalk. This is the example same situation with the
> packages in your MySpecs. This will all go away once we push
> these upstream, but for now I think this will work.
>
> My plan was to:
>
> - get the script written (mostly done)
> - fork MySpecs on github
> - run the script
> - prep repo for tito
> - commit / push
> - have you do a pull request to merge in the changes
>
> Thoughts?
>
> jesus
>
>