#92: Need rootfiles package in fedora:latest Docker base image
-----------------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: scollier | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Docker Base Container | Keywords:
-----------------------------------+--------------------
We need the .bashrc in order to properly change the bash prompt once
changed into the image.
For example, here's the fedora:20 image:
-bash-4.2# docker run -it fedora:20 bash
[root@845950cd95f1 /]# cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
[root@845950cd95f1 /]# rpm -qf /root/.bashrc
rootfiles-8.1-16.fc20.noarch
For example, here's the fedora:latest image:
-bash-4.2# docker run -it fedora:latest bash
bash-4.3# rpm -qf /root/.bashrc
error: file /root/.bashrc: No such file or directory
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/92>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#86: qcow2 images text is a bit obscure / OpenStack-only
----------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: jzb | Owner: jzb
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Website & Wiki | Keywords:
----------------------------+--------------------
Lars Kellogg-Stedman sent a note to the Fedora Cloud list today noting,
rightly, that the libvirt audience might miss the qcow2 images because
it's labeled "OpenStack" (only) rather than being more expansive.
We need to correct this and add instructions for using cloud-init with the
image in Virt-Manager, etc.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/86>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#87: Fedora Magazine Post: How to Use Dockerfiles
-----------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: jzb | Owner: jzb
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Docker Base Container | Keywords: meeting
-----------------------------------+---------------------
Need to do a post on how to use Dockerfiles and maybe how to contribute
patches to Dockerfiles.
Should this also live on the wiki?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/87>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#68: support HVM instances in EC2
------------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Alpha)
Component: Cloud Base Image | Keywords:
------------------------------+-------------------------------
We currently only support Xen paravirtualized images (PV) in EC2. We need
to support HVM as well.
(This will require changes to our EC2 image production and upload process,
and may require changes to our bootloader code as well. Particularly, it
probably takes away our clever hack for providing different kernel
parameters in EC2.)
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/68>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
I just tried to spin up "cloud" instance of F21 on EC2 only to discover
it's requirements for 12G volume (???). Am I doing something wrong or
did F21 jumped from moderate 2-3G (F20) over to 12G "overnight". I
assumed "cloud image" would be a tiny set of packages with very little
requirements to fit into all flavors offered by EC2 and alike. Was this
done to accommodate Docker?
--
Dmitry Makovey
Web Systems Administrator
Athabasca University
(780) 675-6245
---
Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem
Woody Allen
When in trouble when in doubt run in circles scream and shout
http://www.wordwizard.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19330
============================
#fedora-meeting-1: cloud sig
============================
Meeting started by roshi at 19:00:42 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-01-28/fedora_cloud_s…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (roshi, 19:01:04)
* Follow Up (roshi, 19:03:53)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/94 (dustymabe,
19:05:26)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/report/9 (roshi, 19:06:50)
* HVM Instances (#68) (roshi, 19:07:16)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/68 (roshi, 19:07:24)
* Open Floor (roshi, 19:23:21)
* Meeting is going to end early due to not meeting quorum (roshi,
19:23:58)
Meeting ended at 19:28:26 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* roshi (51)
* dustymabe (28)
* Corey84 (13)
* zodbot (8)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
#91: Update Timezone for the docker images
-----------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner: kushal
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Docker Base Container | Keywords: meeting
-----------------------------------+-----------------------
In the kickstart currently it is configured as New York, it should be UTC.
This issue was first mentioned by lsm5.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/91>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2015-01-28 from 19:00:00 to 20:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meeting(a)irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar//meeting/1999/
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-01-26
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
I seem to have forgotten how to use the "send" button on my mail client,
so this annoucnement is getting out a bit late. Apologies for that!
We've got another blocker review in a couple hours! We currently have
several proposed blockers: 2 Alpha, 1 Beta and 2 Final. So if you're
around after the QA meeting, come and join us for some blocker review
goodness :)
If you want to take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers, the
full list can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/
Make sure to click through the milestones to see how many we have before
the meeting!
We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F22 can be found on the
wiki [0].
For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process,
check out these links:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process
And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
See you soon!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org