cloud February 2018

cloud@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
8 discussions

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.93
by noreply＠fedoraproject.org 27 Feb '18

27 Feb '18

2 1

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by dusty＠dustymabe.com 26 Feb '18

26 Feb '18

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2018-02-28 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by dusty＠dustymabe.com 19 Feb '18

19 Feb '18

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2018-02-21 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/

1 0

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement
by noreply＠fedoraproject.org 13 Feb '18

13 Feb '18

2 1

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by dusty＠dustymabe.com 12 Feb '18

12 Feb '18

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2018-02-14 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by dusty＠dustymabe.com 05 Feb '18

05 Feb '18

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2018-02-07 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/

1 0

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement
by noreply＠fedoraproject.org 01 Feb '18

01 Feb '18

2 1

Release criteria proposals: Edition branding and installer customizations
by Adam Williamson 01 Feb '18

01 Feb '18

sgallagh and I both noticed that the release criteria do not currently include any requirements around Edition branding or installer customizations. We think they probably should. Thus, we're proposing the following new criteria. They would be in a new section for each page, something like "Edition requirements" or something like that, probably with a brief explanation of what "Editions" are outside of any specific criterion text. For Beta: == Installer customization == For each Edition, all significant functional customization of installer behavior that are intended to be a part of that Edition must take effect on that Edition's installable release-blocking images. footnote: 'Significant functional?': significant functional customization would usually include, for e.g., changes to the default filesystem and firewall configuration. The WG or SIG responsible for each Edition has the definitive say on what is or is not considered a 'significant functional customization' for that Edition. For Final: == Self-identification == For each Edition, the installer must be clearly identified as that Edition in all of that Edition's installable release-blocking images. Also, for any deployment of that Edition in accordance with the rest of these criteria, the relevant fields in {{filename|/etc/os-release}} must include the correct Edition name. Thoughts, comments, suggestions, flames? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

1 2

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud February 2018