People keep asking me what they can do to help. This is awesome, but I feel like sometimes my answers are too wide open. Plus, I think we could benefit from some more overall planning anyway.
I threw this together... about 5 minutes of effort total so far. I will expand further, but really I don't want this to be _my_ list... it should be _our_ list (Cloud WG members and the whole cloud SIG) -- basically, the things that we want or need to get done.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Cloud_ToDo
Possibly it would be useful to separate ongoing work from one-time work, and prioritize a bit. But initially, I wanted to just start getting things on (virtual) paper. Feel free to pitch in! What's there right now is literally what I thought of off the top of my head to kind of get started. We should systematically go through the PRD and generate work areas and work items.
And possibly, get people's names attached to some of them. :)
Hi, This might be totally out of topic here to some extent, but I felt like I had to ask.
In the document(Virtual paper) I see you have mentioned building images for open shift. Should we put general PAAS so we can support more platforms. I know we might be inclined to open shift for various reasons.
Kindly do advice.
Thank you.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
People keep asking me what they can do to help. This is awesome, but I feel like sometimes my answers are too wide open. Plus, I think we could benefit from some more overall planning anyway.
I threw this together... about 5 minutes of effort total so far. I will expand further, but really I don't want this to be _my_ list... it should be _our_ list (Cloud WG members and the whole cloud SIG) -- basically, the things that we want or need to get done.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Cloud_ToDo
Possibly it would be useful to separate ongoing work from one-time work, and prioritize a bit. But initially, I wanted to just start getting things on (virtual) paper. Feel free to pitch in! What's there right now is literally what I thought of off the top of my head to kind of get started. We should systematically go through the PRD and generate work areas and work items.
And possibly, get people's names attached to some of them. :)
-- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- mattdm@fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:58:44AM +0300, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
In the document(Virtual paper) I see you have mentioned building images for open shift. Should we put general PAAS so we can support more platforms. I know we might be inclined to open shift for various reasons.
Well, in addition to the Red Hat connection, there's another key one -- it's the only PaaS infrastructure we have packaged in Fedora right now. We certainly want to support deploying *any* open source PaaS on Fedora Cloud, but that's the main reason this one got on the list. The idea would be to have a pre-configured image or set of images you could just boot up and be ready to go. If someone is interested in working on this -- for OpenShift or for any PaaS software -- that'd be cool.
Hi,
Thanks for the response. I would love to but to be honest I do not think I am good enough just yet. If I can assist someone or have someone point me in the right direction then we are golden.
Kind Regards
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:58:44AM +0300, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
In the document(Virtual paper) I see you have mentioned building images
for
open shift. Should we put general PAAS so we can support more platforms.
I
know we might be inclined to open shift for various reasons.
Well, in addition to the Red Hat connection, there's another key one -- it's the only PaaS infrastructure we have packaged in Fedora right now. We certainly want to support deploying *any* open source PaaS on Fedora Cloud, but that's the main reason this one got on the list. The idea would be to have a pre-configured image or set of images you could just boot up and be ready to go. If someone is interested in working on this -- for OpenShift or for any PaaS software -- that'd be cool.
-- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- mattdm@fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Jan 27, 2014 8:58 PM, "Frankie Onuonga" frankie.onuonga@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, This might be totally out of topic here to some extent, but I felt like I
had to ask.
In the document(Virtual paper) I see you have mentioned building images
for open shift. Should we put general PAAS so we can support more platforms. I know we might be inclined to open shift for various reasons.
As someone from the OpenShift camp, I think it would be a great idea to make this be more general PaaS where OpenShift could be a subcategory (as other PaaSs would as well) and I would love to see other PaaS technology running on Fedora. The more the marrier.
Also, is there planned to be an IaaS category of that document at some point or is that out of scope?
-AdamM
Kindly do advice.
Thank you.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
People keep asking me what they can do to help. This is awesome, but I
feel
like sometimes my answers are too wide open. Plus, I think we could
benefit
from some more overall planning anyway.
I threw this together... about 5 minutes of effort total so far. I will expand further, but really I don't want this to be _my_ list... it
should be
_our_ list (Cloud WG members and the whole cloud SIG) -- basically, the things that we want or need to get done.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Cloud_ToDo
Possibly it would be useful to separate ongoing work from one-time work,
and
prioritize a bit. But initially, I wanted to just start getting things on (virtual) paper. Feel free to pitch in! What's there right now is
literally
what I thought of off the top of my head to kind of get started. We
should
systematically go through the PRD and generate work areas and work items.
And possibly, get people's names attached to some of them. :)
-- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- mattdm@fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- Skype: Frankie.Onuonga twitter: Frankieonuonga irc #freenode: Frankie.onuonga
cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:35:16AM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
As someone from the OpenShift camp, I think it would be a great idea to make this be more general PaaS where OpenShift could be a subcategory (as other PaaSs would as well) and I would love to see other PaaS technology running on Fedora. The more the marrier.
We had decided that we wanted to at least initially focus on a generic "base image" plus 2 to 4 images focused on specific solutions. The generic image, of course, could be the foundation on which any PaaS is installed.
The thinking was that we would make an OpenShift-tailored image be one of the 2-4 specific one. But if you don't think that's useful, we could take that off the list. (I'm sure there's plenty of _other_ OpenShift work we could put on the general todo, of course.) It doesn't strike me as useful to have a generic-PaaS-focused spin -- that's the generic base already, isn't it?
Maybe I'm just not getting what you guys are saying. :)
Also, is there planned to be an IaaS category of that document at some point or is that out of scope?
Out of scope for the Cloud _product_ and Cloud WG, *in* scope for the Cloud SIG. And therefore I think in scope for this list, although maybe it would be useful to tag or segment things in some way.
Hmmmm. Maybe the wiki isn't the best technology for this list -- I wonder if we should use Trello (or the open source clone I saw some people were working on?).....
+1 for trello
On 29 January 2014 13:31, Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:35:16AM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
As someone from the OpenShift camp, I think it would be a great idea to make this be more general PaaS where OpenShift could be a subcategory (as other PaaSs would as well) and I would love to see other PaaS technology running on Fedora. The more the marrier.
We had decided that we wanted to at least initially focus on a generic "base image" plus 2 to 4 images focused on specific solutions. The generic image, of course, could be the foundation on which any PaaS is installed.
The thinking was that we would make an OpenShift-tailored image be one of the 2-4 specific one. But if you don't think that's useful, we could take that off the list. (I'm sure there's plenty of _other_ OpenShift work we could put on the general todo, of course.) It doesn't strike me as useful to have a generic-PaaS-focused spin -- that's the generic base already, isn't it?
Maybe I'm just not getting what you guys are saying. :)
Also, is there planned to be an IaaS category of that document at some point or is that out of scope?
Out of scope for the Cloud _product_ and Cloud WG, *in* scope for the Cloud SIG. And therefore I think in scope for this list, although maybe it would be useful to tag or segment things in some way.
Hmmmm. Maybe the wiki isn't the best technology for this list -- I wonder if we should use Trello (or the open source clone I saw some people were working on?).....
-- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- mattdm@fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Vaidas Jablonskis jablonskis@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for trello
I would suggest Cantas in open-shift or something over trello.
josh
On 01/29/2014 02:38 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Vaidas Jablonskis jablonskis@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for trello
I would suggest Cantas in open-shift or something over trello.
Agreed. There is a screenshot here for people to check out: https://github.com/onepiecejs/nodejs-cantas.
josh _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:40:57PM +0100, Sam Kottler wrote:
I would suggest Cantas in open-shift or something over trello.
Agreed. There is a screenshot here for people to check out: https://github.com/onepiecejs/nodejs-cantas.
Yeah, I hadn't looked at that in a bit and wasn't sure if it was ready for serious use. If it is, I'm all for it.
Let's add setting that up to that top of the todo list, then. :)
I'm off to FOSDEM and then meetings and meetings and meetings in Brno next week and then Devconf. It's possible that I will have time (during one of those lonnnng meetings?) to set it up. But if someone else wants to do it, that would be *awesome*.
Hello, I will try to install it on my OpenShift account this week before arriving to FOSDEM to see if I can make it work. So if I have problems it should be easier to finish it at FOSDEM. See you soon at FOSDEM !
2014-01-29 Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:40:57PM +0100, Sam Kottler wrote:
I would suggest Cantas in open-shift or something over trello.
Agreed. There is a screenshot here for people to check out: https://github.com/onepiecejs/nodejs-cantas.
Yeah, I hadn't looked at that in a bit and wasn't sure if it was ready for serious use. If it is, I'm all for it.
Let's add setting that up to that top of the todo list, then. :)
I'm off to FOSDEM and then meetings and meetings and meetings in Brno next week and then Devconf. It's possible that I will have time (during one of those lonnnng meetings?) to set it up. But if someone else wants to do it, that would be *awesome*.
-- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- mattdm@fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:36:30PM +0100, Bertrand Juglas wrote:
Hello, I will try to install it on my OpenShift account this week before arriving to FOSDEM to see if I can make it work. So if I have problems it should be easier to finish it at FOSDEM.
Hi Bertrand! Any luck with this? This will be a really useful resource and I'm looking forward to it. :)
cloud@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Miller -
Bertrand Juglas -
Frankie -
Josh Boyer -
Matthew Miller -
Sam Kottler -
Vaidas Jablonskis