We have a little over a week until the first F19 final go/no-go meeting (where we decide whether or not the release is done) and there are no posted results for F19 final AMI tests yet.
If you have been testing the AMIs, please report your results. If you haven't been testing them but are interested in doing so - please do. Show stoppers for the AMIs are likely to be release blocking and the sooner that those issues are discovered, the less likely that we'll slip the F19 final release.
To report results or to find test cases, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
This will redirect to the most recent spin (TC5 at the time of this email).
The relevant test cases are: - QA:Testcase_EC2_AMI_Validation - QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt
There are links to the specific test cases from the test matrices and result reporting is just editing the wiki page (there are example result formats on the page as well).
Thanks,
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Flink" tflink@redhat.com To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:46:22 PM Subject: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
We have a little over a week until the first F19 final go/no-go meeting (where we decide whether or not the release is done) and there are no posted results for F19 final AMI tests yet.
Are there AMI id's posted somewhere for anything beyond F19 beta AMIs?
If you have been testing the AMIs, please report your results. If you haven't been testing them but are interested in doing so - please do. Show stoppers for the AMIs are likely to be release blocking and the sooner that those issues are discovered, the less likely that we'll slip the F19 final release.
To report results or to find test cases, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
This will redirect to the most recent spin (TC5 at the time of this email).
The relevant test cases are:
- QA:Testcase_EC2_AMI_Validation
- QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt
There are links to the specific test cases from the test matrices and result reporting is just editing the wiki page (there are example result formats on the page as well).
Thanks,
Tim
cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:55:19 -0400 (EDT) Robyn Bergeron rbergero@redhat.com wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Flink" tflink@redhat.com To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:46:22 PM Subject: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
We have a little over a week until the first F19 final go/no-go meeting (where we decide whether or not the release is done) and there are no posted results for F19 final AMI tests yet.
Are there AMI id's posted somewhere for anything beyond F19 beta AMIs?
Sorry, I thought the AMI ids were posted somewhere.
F19 TC5 AMIs were posted to us-east-1: * 64bit ami-cf6c1da6 * 32bit ami-616e1f08
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Flink" tflink@redhat.com To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:46:22 PM Subject: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
We have a little over a week until the first F19 final go/no-go meeting (where we decide whether or not the release is done) and there are no posted results for F19 final AMI tests yet.
If you have been testing the AMIs, please report your results. If you haven't been testing them but are interested in doing so - please do. Show stoppers for the AMIs are likely to be release blocking and the sooner that those issues are discovered, the less likely that we'll slip the F19 final release.
In my opinion there should be an account for people to use to test the images. Access could be granted via IAM and resources could be limited that way.
To report results or to find test cases, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
This will redirect to the most recent spin (TC5 at the time of this email).
The relevant test cases are:
- QA:Testcase_EC2_AMI_Validation
- QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt
There are links to the specific test cases from the test matrices and result reporting is just editing the wiki page (there are example result formats on the page as well).
Thanks,
Tim
cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Kottler" skottler@redhat.com To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 3:02:05 PM Subject: Re: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Flink" tflink@redhat.com To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:46:22 PM Subject: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
We have a little over a week until the first F19 final go/no-go meeting (where we decide whether or not the release is done) and there are no posted results for F19 final AMI tests yet.
If you have been testing the AMIs, please report your results. If you haven't been testing them but are interested in doing so - please do. Show stoppers for the AMIs are likely to be release blocking and the sooner that those issues are discovered, the less likely that we'll slip the F19 final release.
In my opinion there should be an account for people to use to test the images. Access could be granted via IAM and resources could be limited that way.
Why go that route vs. simply publishing the images for anyone to test?
The advantage I see to what you're saying is that people don't have to basically spend their own money to test images - but by the same token I don't think we want to limit it only to that group.
I've set up stuff on the community-cloud account for usage with IAM before - it's been a while but I seem to recall it was slightly tedious but reasonable enough for one-off events (having test accounts for an event, for example) - but if we started doling out access with every TC/RC I'd probably want to figure out how to get that scripted into being part of releng processes. I could probably write it but at some point I have to imagine that what would take me a week would probably take someone else very very little time :)
Thoughts? Garrett - since you're the one who helped me with the IAM stuff and wrote the wiki instructions and whatnot - do you think that could somehow be tied into FAS groups or something?
-r
To report results or to find test cases, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
This will redirect to the most recent spin (TC5 at the time of this email).
The relevant test cases are:
- QA:Testcase_EC2_AMI_Validation
- QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt
There are links to the specific test cases from the test matrices and result reporting is just editing the wiki page (there are example result formats on the page as well).
Thanks,
Tim
cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robyn Bergeron" rbergero@redhat.com To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 3:09:37 PM Subject: Re: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Kottler" skottler@redhat.com To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 3:02:05 PM Subject: Re: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Flink" tflink@redhat.com To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 2:46:22 PM Subject: Test Results for F19 EC2 AMIs
We have a little over a week until the first F19 final go/no-go meeting (where we decide whether or not the release is done) and there are no posted results for F19 final AMI tests yet.
If you have been testing the AMIs, please report your results. If you haven't been testing them but are interested in doing so - please do. Show stoppers for the AMIs are likely to be release blocking and the sooner that those issues are discovered, the less likely that we'll slip the F19 final release.
In my opinion there should be an account for people to use to test the images. Access could be granted via IAM and resources could be limited that way.
Why go that route vs. simply publishing the images for anyone to test?
The advantage I see to what you're saying is that people don't have to basically spend their own money to test images - but by the same token I don't think we want to limit it only to that group.
Right, I think it'd be cool for us to cover the cost of testing our images. Even if each person just got to create a m1.small or another type of small (cheap) instance, it'd be great not to ask people to test beta software on their own dime.
I've set up stuff on the community-cloud account for usage with IAM before - it's been a while but I seem to recall it was slightly tedious but reasonable enough for one-off events (having test accounts for an event, for example) - but if we started doling out access with every TC/RC I'd probably want to figure out how to get that scripted into being part of releng processes. I could probably write it but at some point I have to imagine that what would take me a week would probably take someone else very very little time :)
Thoughts? Garrett - since you're the one who helped me with the IAM stuff and wrote the wiki instructions and whatnot - do you think that could somehow be tied into FAS groups or something?
FAS integration would be excellent. I can do some research about external auth options they have if someone else doesn't beat me to it.
-r
To report results or to find test cases, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
This will redirect to the most recent spin (TC5 at the time of this email).
The relevant test cases are:
- QA:Testcase_EC2_AMI_Validation
- QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt
There are links to the specific test cases from the test matrices and result reporting is just editing the wiki page (there are example result formats on the page as well).
Thanks,
Tim
cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:46:22PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
We have a little over a week until the first F19 final go/no-go meeting (where we decide whether or not the release is done) and there are no posted results for F19 final AMI tests yet.
The recent TCs have been broken to various degrees. TC4 totally failed to inject ssh host keys in EC2, and TC3 and TC5 both had the annoying problem with selinux-based failure. This has been a barrier to widespread testing.
TC6 is available now, so we should be able to get wider testing, even if a bit late (I'll post a separate message about that for more visibility in a minute).
The relevant test cases are:
- QA:Testcase_EC2_AMI_Validation
- QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt
For F20, I would like to work with the QA team to add some more cloud-image specific release criteria. Some that come to mind:
1. Cloud-init tests, which should work in both openstack and ec2:
* filesystem grown to use available storage
* swap is enabled (in ec2; not sure about openstack)
* cloud-config userdata works: - change username - install packages
2. Validation of downloadable qcow2 and raw images in OpenStack * copy ec2 case, basically
3. Basic image sanity tests
* size - qcow2 size - on-disk size
* running processes - (as few as possible!)
cloud@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Matthew Miller -
Robyn Bergeron -
Sam Kottler -
Tim Flink