ec2/fedora-18-x86_64-ec2.ks | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
New commits: commit 4253110dc925b4ed9aed576e88f2d5c6225c039b Author: Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org Date: Thu Nov 8 22:33:28 2012 -0500
install binutils initially and then remove, so dracut can strip the initramfs
diff --git a/ec2/fedora-18-x86_64-ec2.ks b/ec2/fedora-18-x86_64-ec2.ks index 090e1bf..e7c62ae 100644 --- a/ec2/fedora-18-x86_64-ec2.ks +++ b/ec2/fedora-18-x86_64-ec2.ks @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pciutils kernel man-db
+# this will get removed later in this file, but +# having it here lets dracut strip the initramfs +binutils + +# leave eth0 alone -biosdevname
# package to setup cloudy bits for us @@ -46,6 +51,9 @@ cloud-init # more ec2-ify %post --erroronfail
+yum -y remove binutils + + # fstab mounting is different for x86_64 and i386 cat <<EOL > /etc/fstab LABEL=_/ / ext4 defaults 1 1
Matthew Miller (mattdm@fedoraproject.org) said:
ec2/fedora-18-x86_64-ec2.ks | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
New commits: commit 4253110dc925b4ed9aed576e88f2d5c6225c039b Author: Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org Date: Thu Nov 8 22:33:28 2012 -0500
install binutils initially and then remove, so dracut can strip the initramfs
That's just weird. How much does that actually save us?
Bill
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 12:29:55PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Miller (mattdm@fedoraproject.org) said:
ec2/fedora-18-x86_64-ec2.ks | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) New commits: commit 4253110dc925b4ed9aed576e88f2d5c6225c039b Author: Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org Date: Thu Nov 8 22:33:28 2012 -0500 install binutils initially and then remove, so dracut can strip the initramfs
That's just weird. How much does that actually save us?
It turns out "not anything". The initramfs turns out to be the same size with binutils installed and not. I was just testing to see if it would work and there was no real reason to push this one.
cloud@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Bill Nottingham -
Matthew Miller