copr-devel August 2015

copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

5 participants
5 discussions

disable networking in Copr by default
by Pavel Raiskup 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

Just to be more pedantic and probably bit more secure, what about making networking in copr opt-in (at least for new projects)? If build of my package used internet arbitrarily, I would be warned very early.. Also, in Koji we also do not have networking, so we can faster teach (future) Fedora packagers. Thanks for considering, Pavel

3 3

New version of Copr (includes dist-git)
by Miroslav Suchý 21 Oct '15

21 Oct '15

It is my pleasure to announce that we just upgraded https://copr.fedoraproject.org It includes several major improvements: * UI converted to PatternFly [1]. Most visible change is that tables (e.g. list of builds) can be sorted using any column and you can filter visible rows using any value. * dist-git support -- We store your SRPM in dist-git now. It is not accessible directly using fedpkg (it is in plan later). Dist-git is browsable via cgit [2]. This allows us to offer you upload of SRPM directly from your workstation. Just navigate to: New Build -> Upload SRPM or if you upgrade to python-copr-1.58-1 (submitted to updates just today) then you can do: copr-cli build name/project ./some.src.rpm While we assume that uploading SRPM will be most popular method, we preserved option to pass SRPM url. You can see new state of your build - "Importing". It is obviously the moment when we import your SRPM into dist-git. * In project properties (Edit tab) you can now add you email if you want to be contacted by users in case of some problems with your project. * We improved queue handling of various architectures. This should fix those long waiting time of PPC64LE builds. [1] https://www.patternfly.org/ [2] http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/ Mirek Suchý

5 7

swig fails to build due to ccache test
by Baurzhan Muftakhidinov 11 Sep '15

11 Sep '15

Hello, I was trying to build swig on copr, but every time ccache tests fail. [1] I see on Koji swig builds are successful. Any advice on fixing build process? Thank you [1] http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/baurzhanm/swig/fedora-rawhid…

2 6

Copr build failures
by Jean-Marc Liger 20 Aug '15

20 Aug '15

Hi, My tool of choice is broken for project https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/gnome-extensions/ All my new builds are failing without having started or finished. Forcing rebuild with https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/gnome-extensions/repeat_build/… is allowed with the same result for the new build. Forcing delete with https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/gnome-extensions/delete_build/… is disabled. All my others COPR projects are working well and help is welcome. Jean-Marc LIGER

2 6

Re: F23: Copr build failure: glibc
by Sérgio Basto 17 Aug '15

17 Aug '15

Hi, redirecting to copr-devel On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 09:18 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 15:15 +0200, Rajeesh K V wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Copr fails to build for F23 (i686, x86_64) due to error: > > > > Error: Package glibc-2.21.90-21.fc23.x86_64.rpm is not signed > > > > For instance see the build log > > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rajeeshknambiar/kf5-k > > de-apps/fedora-23-x86_64/plasma-volume-control-5.3.90-1.fc22/root.log > > > > > > > Known issue, should be fixed later today when Bodhi is activated for > Fedora 23. I still have those failures in fedora-23-ppc64le [1] and fedora-rawhide-ppc64le buildroots . Should we open bug reports in bugzilla , product Copr [3] ? [1] https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/patchutils_with_di… DEBUG util.py:377: Error: Package tar-1.28-6.fc23.ppc64le.rpm is not signed [2] https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/patchutils_with_di… DEBUG util.py:377: Error: nothing provides libsemanage.so.1()(64bit) needed by shadow-utils-2:4.2.1-2.fc23.ppc64le. DEBUG util.py:377: nothing provides libsemanage.so.1()(64bit) needed by shadow-utils-2:4.2.1-2.fc23.ppc64le DEBUG util.py:488: Child return code was: 1 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Copr Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.

2 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

copr-devel August 2015