copr-devel March 2017

copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

7 participants
10 discussions

please clean deleted builds
by Sérgio Basto 29 May '17

29 May '17

Hi in https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/kde4for23/ please delete all gpgme builds 00521854-gpgme/ they are at least in fedora-24-x86_64/ fedora-25-x86_64/ fedora-25- i386/ For exampple in fedora-24-i386 I got 2: 00521836-gpgme/ and 00521854- gpgme/ Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.

2 5

[Fwd: Re: please clean deleted builds]
by Sérgio Basto 29 Mar '17

29 Mar '17

Sorry, on press reply doesn't add copr-devel Mailing list -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: sergio <sergio(a)serjux.com> To: Michal <clime(a)redhat.com> Subject: Re: please clean deleted builds Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:14:48 +0100 Thanks, it happens to me a lot, but usually it is not problem because we have newer versions in repo, thought that might be easy make a script to check that, Corp db vs file system , and fix it. Which run once per day Sent from my DOOGEE Em 29/03/2017 09:25, Michal Novotny <clime(a)redhat.com> escreveu: All gpgme builds were deleted from sergiomb/kde4for23. I still wonder why they stayed there. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> wrote: Hi in https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/kde4for23/ please delete all gpgme builds 00521854-gpgme/ they are at least in fedora-24-x86_64/ fedora-25-x86_64/ fedora-25- i386/ For exampple in fedora-24-i386 I got 2: 00521836-gpgme/ and 00521854- gpgme/ Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org Thanks, it happens to me a lot, but usually it is not problem because we have newer versions in repo, thought that might be easy make a script to check that, Corp db vs file system , and fix it. Which run once per day Sent from my DOOGEEEm 29/03/2017 09:25, Michal Novotny <clime(a)redhat.co m> escreveu: > > > All gpgme builds were deleted from sergiomb/kde4for23. I still wonder > why they stayed there. > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi > > in https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/kde4for > > 23/ > > > > please delete all gpgme builds > > > > 00521854-gpgme/ > > > > they are at least in fedora-24-x86_64/ fedora-25-x86_64/ fedora- > > 25- > > i386/ > > For exampple in fedora-24-i386 I got 2: 00521836-gpgme/ and > > 00521854- > > gpgme/ > > > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Sérgio M. B. > > _______________________________________________ > > copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted > > .org > > -- Sérgio M. B.

1 0

Copr problems?
by Scott Talbert 27 Mar '17

27 Mar '17

Are there known problems with Copr right now? I submitted a build yesterday and it took hours to even start running. Now, it has been "running" for 8 hours but there are not even any logs yet.

2 1

copr-dist-git outage
by Kevin Fenzi 22 Mar '17

22 Mar '17

Greetings. This afternoon we noticed that copr-dist-git wasn't processing correctly, nor allowing ssh access. Looking at the console there were a large number of kernel oopses, so we rebooted. The instance came back up, but didn't finish booting correctly. (It was stuck thinking it was still booting up). We fixed up that issue, but unfortunately, the existing queue of imports failed and was lost to us. :( Sorry for the trouble, but it's back processing normally again now. Please resubmit any builds you submitted in this window. kevin

1 0

Copr and flatpaks
by David Haltinner 22 Mar '17

22 Mar '17

I just wanted to start a conversation around expanding Copr to output flatpak files using Fedora (likely others like Gnome, KDE, etc too) runtimes. As flatpak is being pushed into the world, getting ahead of the curve and helping people turn their projects into flatpaks with Copr would be a good benefit on the community side, and likely just as helpful for fedora package maintainers who will work on flatpaks in the future. As you don't actually need to use rpms to make flatpaks, an entirely new mock plugin could be made for that purpose, if one doesn't already exist that I am unaware of. Would help to bring it into Koji as well in the future. There may be another way to just install a built rpm into a chroot and turn around and add the metadata and build-export into a flatpak repo and ignore mock altogether. Thoughts?

2 1

COPR maintenance
by Michal Novotny 11 Mar '17

11 Mar '17

Hello, today 11/3 there will be maintenance of copr-dist-git machine due to disk space. The builds will be delayed until maintenance is done. It will go on approximately from 7pm UTC to 2am UTC. Thank you COPR team

1 0

COPR rawhide repo links
by Michal Novotny 06 Mar '17

06 Mar '17

Dear rawhide users, if you have enabled a COPR repo in the last three months (since the beginning of December last year till yesterday), then it points to fedora-$releasever-$basearch. You can reenable it by using `dnf copr enable <project>` to get .repo file pointing to actual fedora-rawhide chroot in the given project. Sorry for this clime

2 4

Random feedback from Telegram: Copr vs. AUR
by Adam Samalik 03 Mar '17

03 Mar '17

Hey guys! Just in case you run out of ideas about making Copr even better, I just saw this feedback on the Fedora Telegram channel comparing Fedora Copr and Arch Linux AUR: "... Justing W. Flory: Fedora has a similar concept with Copr, but it's not as widely used as AURs. lian.rs: Copr is not quite that. Copr is more like Ubuntu PPAs, and lacks many features such as voting, forum for each package, being able to review the package before installing, etc, and most importantly Copr is a repo tool, not a packaging tool. You need to know in advance the repo that contains the software you want to install. It's not as convenient :(" As a former Arch Linux user I kind of agree. Having some voting mechanism and maybe even the forum/discussions would be fantastic! What do you guys think? I don't have that much time for Copr as I used to, but, as always, I'm happy to help with UI! ;-) Cheers! Adam -- Adam Šamalík --------------------------- Software Engineer Red Hat

3 2

error: Couldn't fork %post(cups-filters-libs-1.10.0-3.fc25.ppc64le): Cannot allocate memory
by Sérgio Basto 03 Mar '17

03 Mar '17

Hello! , This build fail [1] is about no more resources in machine ? or is an issue in builders ? [1] https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/opencv/fedora- 25-ppc64le/00520508-opencv/root.log.gz https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/opencv/build/520508/ Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B.

2 5

Network problems in the cloud solved!
by Michal Novotny 02 Mar '17

02 Mar '17

Great news! Thanks to nirik, the cloud networking problem has been solved. See https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5814 for details. COPR should now function properly again. Thank you for holding still with us COPR team

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

copr-devel March 2017