On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:57 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:13:13 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 11:55 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:28:02 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > > Because it does not fit one big class of users we want
> > > to cover - "ordinary desktop users".
> > They can do:
> > (eu-unstrip -n --core=`echo ./core.*`; echo; gdb -nx -ex "set
debug-file-directory /_N" -ex "core-file `echo ./core.*`" -ex bt -ex q)
2>/dev/null | nc host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net
> > can't they?
> No. Desktop users (not in RH, I mean people who install Fedora at home,
> office, institute) usually won't do it.
> For these users we want to provide out-of-the box working config,
> no tweaking necessary apart from bugzilla config.
> Also, many (most) such users would want to use GUI.
We do not understand here each other.
Sure this command should be run automatically from inside the ABRT the time it
runs the `gdb' backtrace. Regular Fedora user will not ever know any retrace
Would you be happy with the software which does something like this
without you knowing it?
There is already the bugzilla.redhat.com
remote server component
occasionally had its failures and it is not freely duplicable as it contains
already exists. It has people who are paid to keep
it running. Now we'd need yet another set of servers to deploy and
support for years to come.
Jan, the abrt server of sorts is planned, including the capability
of processing corefiles. I'm not saying it's a bad idea.
I'm just saying it can't be used by all users, there are users
who would not want to use it.