On 06/27/2011 01:19 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 13:11 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 11:05 +0200, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
>> This code belongs to abrt.git.
> Why do you think so?
I would like to expand a bit.
Having cli functions split into two binaries in two different packages
makes it a bit harder to work with it, both for developers
(two different source directories) and for users (they need
to remember which operation they can do with which tool
- report-cli or abrt-cli).
This split has to have some advantages which outweigh this.
What are they? Off-hand, I don't see any.
Just from the top of my head:
- abrt-cli needs to know about /var/spool/abrt which is "internal" abrt
knowledge and any part of libreport should know about it