The Workstation WG meeting is scheduled for this Wednesday, 2015-Jan-20 at 1500 UTC (10:00 EST, 16:00 CEST). This agenda is open for additions/corrections; please send by tomorrow at 1200 UTC. (Holding open longer because I was late sending this out.)
* i686 Workstation images -- Does the WG want to keep producing these? (See list for full discussion.)
* Are there any remaining Changes to file for F24?
* F24 Test Days -- Do we want any dedicated for F24?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2016 10:12 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
The Workstation WG meeting is scheduled for this Wednesday, 2015-Jan-20 at 1500 UTC (10:00 EST, 16:00 CEST). This agenda is open for additions/corrections; please send by tomorrow at 1200 UTC. (Holding open longer because I was late sending this out.)
- i686 Workstation images -- Does the WG want to keep producing
these? (See list for full discussion.)
Are there any remaining Changes to file for F24?
F24 Test Days -- Do we want any dedicated for F24?
Maybe not for this week, but would it make sense to have a check-in on Wayland readiness at least a few weeks before Alpha Freeze?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:39:15AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 01/19/2016 10:12 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
The Workstation WG meeting is scheduled for this Wednesday, 2015-Jan-20 at 1500 UTC (10:00 EST, 16:00 CEST). This agenda is open for additions/corrections; please send by tomorrow at 1200 UTC. (Holding open longer because I was late sending this out.)
- i686 Workstation images -- Does the WG want to keep producing
these? (See list for full discussion.)
Are there any remaining Changes to file for F24?
F24 Test Days -- Do we want any dedicated for F24?
Maybe not for this week, but would it make sense to have a check-in on Wayland readiness at least a few weeks before Alpha Freeze?
Good suggestion, thanks.
Just to remind everyone, Alpha Freeze is 2016-03-01. I would recommend we check readiness at the meeting scheduled for 2016-02-10, which gives plenty of heads-up time before the deadline.
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 11:59 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:39:15AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Maybe not for this week, but would it make sense to have a check-in on Wayland readiness at least a few weeks before Alpha Freeze?
Exactly what I was going to propose.
Good suggestion, thanks.
Just to remind everyone, Alpha Freeze is 2016-03-01. I would recommend we check readiness at the meeting scheduled for 2016-02-10, which gives plenty of heads-up time before the deadline.
Sounds good. I trust Matthias and Christian will want to present on this. I think you have an off-by-one in your calendar, though; 2016-02- 10 is three weeks from tomorrow, so no meeting that day.
Michael
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:29:55AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 11:59 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:39:15AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Maybe not for this week, but would it make sense to have a check-in on Wayland readiness at least a few weeks before Alpha Freeze?
Exactly what I was going to propose.
Good suggestion, thanks.
Just to remind everyone, Alpha Freeze is 2016-03-01. I would recommend we check readiness at the meeting scheduled for 2016-02-10, which gives plenty of heads-up time before the deadline.
Sounds good. I trust Matthias and Christian will want to present on this. I think you have an off-by-one in your calendar, though; 2016-02- 10 is three weeks from tomorrow, so no meeting that day.
Oops. 2016-02-03 it is, then.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:06:16AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:29:55AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 11:59 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:39:15AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Maybe not for this week, but would it make sense to have a check-in on Wayland readiness at least a few weeks before Alpha Freeze?
Exactly what I was going to propose.
Good suggestion, thanks.
Just to remind everyone, Alpha Freeze is 2016-03-01. I would recommend we check readiness at the meeting scheduled for 2016-02-10, which gives plenty of heads-up time before the deadline.
Sounds good. I trust Matthias and Christian will want to present on this. I think you have an off-by-one in your calendar, though; 2016-02- 10 is three weeks from tomorrow, so no meeting that day.
Oops. 2016-02-03 it is, then.
Hmm. So, as it turns out 2016-02-03 is when several of us (at least myself, Matthias, and Christian) will be tied up in an all-day session.
Perhaps we should go with 2016-02-10, off schedule, so that most can attend?
Unfortunately, in either case I can't be there, since I'll also be traveling on the 10th & 11th. We'll need a substitute chair.
On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 14:23 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Perhaps we should go with 2016-02-10, off schedule, so that most can attend?
+1 for the next meeting on 2016-02-10. Clearly 2016-02-03 is not a suitable date to discuss Wayland readiness.
Unfortunately, in either case I can't be there, since I'll also be traveling on the 10th & 11th. We'll need a substitute chair.
I can substitute.
Michael
I am fine with moving the meeting too
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Catanzaro" mcatanzaro@gnome.org To: desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 3:05:08 PM Subject: Re: Workstation WG call for agenda 2015-Jan-20
On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 14:23 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Perhaps we should go with 2016-02-10, off schedule, so that most can attend?
+1 for the next meeting on 2016-02-10. Clearly 2016-02-03 is not a suitable date to discuss Wayland readiness.
Unfortunately, in either case I can't be there, since I'll also be traveling on the 10th & 11th. We'll need a substitute chair.
I can substitute.
Michael -- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 02:05:08PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 14:23 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Perhaps we should go with 2016-02-10, off schedule, so that most can attend?
+1 for the next meeting on 2016-02-10. Clearly 2016-02-03 is not a suitable date to discuss Wayland readiness.
Unfortunately, in either case I can't be there, since I'll also be traveling on the 10th & 11th. We'll need a substitute chair.
I can substitute.
Thank you Michael!
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:14:05PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 02:05:08PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 14:23 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Perhaps we should go with 2016-02-10, off schedule, so that most can attend?
+1 for the next meeting on 2016-02-10. Clearly 2016-02-03 is not a suitable date to discuss Wayland readiness.
Unfortunately, in either case I can't be there, since I'll also be traveling on the 10th & 11th. We'll need a substitute chair.
I can substitute.
Thank you Michael!
Just to make sure the meeting schedule is clear: I propose we skip the regularly scheduled meeting 2016-02-03, hold a meeting on 2016-02-10 (which Michael will chair), and then return to the regular biweekly schedule 2016-02-17.
Anyone object?
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 10:12 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
The Workstation WG meeting is scheduled for this Wednesday, 2015-Jan-20 at 1500 UTC (10:00 EST, 16:00 CEST). This agenda is open for additions/corrections; please send by tomorrow at 1200 UTC. (Holding open longer because I was late sending this out.)
If there's any time left, let's talk briefly about ABRT coredumpctl integration: https://github.com/abrt/abrt/issues/1108
On 01/19/2016 09:45 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 10:12 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
- Are there any remaining Changes to file for F24?
I have to admit that I am woefully not up to speed on what changes we did file for F24, other than Wayland. Is graphical upgrade in gnome- software filed, for example ?
I don't think anyone has filed it yet, but let me do that.
desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Christian Schaller -
Kalev Lember -
Matthias Clasen -
Michael Catanzaro -
Paul W. Frields -
Stephen Gallagher