Why not do the opposite and provide the old one as a copr? Splitting up the release in the premiere os distribution of gnome seems very wrong. It'd be like serving a chef's signature dish but swapping out one of her planned sides by default. Present the chefs vision on the menu and allow diners to arrange for substitutions as needed with their waiter. Mmm yum as a waiter.
Sent from my phone, which is not an iphone.
-------- Original message -------- From: Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com Date:01/25/2014 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Michael Catanzaro mcatanzaro@gnome.org Cc: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: So are we skipping a gnome release?
On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 16:42 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 21:02 +0200, Elad Alfassa wrote:
For the reference, here's the feature list https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features
In addition to that from what I've seen in blogs there are more headerbar improvements, new gedit design, new nautilus design, and probably more things I forgot to mention or aren't there yet but might be added by the time it releases.
Hm, Nautilus hasn't seen much more than bugfixes since 3.6. There's indeed a bold new design, but it has not been implemented and surely won't be in 3.12. Nobody's going to care about the Nautilus update.
gedit will be a very major change, though. A lot of GNOME users will love it. Many will not.
How tied-in is gedit? Could we keep it at 3.10 and bump everything else to 3.12, and maybe provide gedit 3.12 in a COPR for those who want it (if we don't go with the all-of-3.12 in a COPR plan)?
desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org