-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 02/22/2018 11:16 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Dusty Mabe <dusty@dustymabe.com mailto:dusty@dustymabe.com> wrote:
In the interest of trying to make things less confusing I suggest the name of this repo be something different. - - We have pagure/atomic-wg which is for the atomic (host) working group. - - We have pagure/fedora-atomic which is for definitions of what goes into FAH - - We have pagure/workstation-ostree-config: defs for what goes into FAW - - We have pagure/atomic-ws: deprecated version of workstation-ostree-config - - We *now* have pagure/fedora-atomic-workstation, which is arguably where pagure/workstation-ostree-config should be - - We also have the *group* pagure/atomic/* so we can nest things under /atomic/ - for example we could create pagure/atomic/workstation-sigAnd pagure/fedora-workstation - which is for the Workstation working group. (And a group pagure/fedora-workstation)
My strong suggestion is that we have *sig* somewhere in the name of the repo. My other suggestion is that we try to figure out a better structure for these repos (maybe nesting more of them under pagure/atomic/) Thoughts?I certainly agree the proliferation of inconsistently named repositories is confusing. I talked about naming with Matthias, and we though that a just-spell-it-out approach seemed least likely to run into mental confusion...
- Is it atomic/workstation or fedora-workstation/atomic?
- Is it atomic-workstation or atomic-ws
But why no -sig if the idea is to be maximally spelled out? Well, partly I didn't think of it, because i was following the model of fedora-workstation, which is not workstation-wg. But also, the idea of this project is that it's issue tracking not just for the SIG, but for Fedora Atomic Workstation as a composition and running system - this allows us to easily promote things to agenda items by adding a "meeting" tag.
There doesn't seem to be any obvious renaming facilities in Pagure, but we could perhaps get things moved by the admins if we figure out a good structure. Or at least a _better_ structure - if fedora-workstation, atomic-wg, fedora-atomic are fixed points, we're not going to get to consistency.
https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/2103 but no one is working on it. anyone interested?
Ideas:
- We could delete my new fedora-atomic-workstation and move workstation-ostree-config to that name and use that as the issue tracking for the system and sig?
Not sure why, but I do prefer to keep the config separate from the issue tracker for atomic workstation as a whole. I look at the sig tracker as a tracker for all things related to atomic workstation (which could include changes to the config or not).
- Maybe atomic-ws could be moved to old-atomic-ws or something like that to make it a little less obtrusive
We could just delete that repo at this point IMHO. workstation-ostree-config, however is something I would want to rename rather than delete (i.e. I would want existing issue/PR https links to still work.
Do people have better ideas to try to get to something more globally consistent?
Unfortunately without the ability to move repos around then I don't have good ideas. The only thing we *could* do is say "if we were able to move repos around what would be the desired structure?" and go with that for new repos.
Dusty