----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Boyer" jwboyer@fedoraproject.org To: "Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop" desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 3:20:44 PM Subject: Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2014 09:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
This with my Personal Opinion hat on, not representing QA:
I'm not sure all/most people who actually want to use Fedora KDE are likely to be sold on doing it by downloading what they will see as 'GNOME', installing that, and then installing KDE on top of it. I think this will be fine for some folks, but there'll be a significant constituency which just wants a KDE image.
In fact we might be creating a bit of a problem, because I can see both "want KDE as an alternative desktop on top of the Workstation product" and "just want Fedora KDE" as two entirely legitimate and viable constituencies, which sort of means we've just created a bunch of extra work for ourselves. I'm not sure I see a clever magical solution to that, though. Engage brain cells...
I'd suggest that for the Fedora Workstation, we declare that KDE is release-blocking *as an optional component atop the Workstation*.
Please explain this further. Having an optional component be release blocking is making my head hurt.
josh
At the risk of misrepresenting Stephen I think what he means, and what I agree with is that we declare that KDE is blocking as in 'it should work' before we do a given release, but it is optional to install for the end user.
Christian