On 04/03/2013 10:25 AM, Ryan Lerch wrote:
On 04/03/2013 03:33 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
control-center-3.8.0-2.fc19 added the Fedora logo (instead of the GNOME logo) on the details panel of the GNOME desktop control center. This is a good idea, but I see two problems:
- Use the full logotype, not just the logomark
- The lack of the ™ symbol next to the logomark violates our own
logo usage guidelines [1].
Elad, Thanks for bringing this up!, However, I dont have a functioning f19 machine at the moment, would you be able to upload a screenshot so we can see the logo as it is currently presented?
WE i think we should also just file a bug against this component in Fedora. Is that the correct course of action?
--ryanlerch
After a quick look into the patch that changed the logo, it seems that it is using the following file (the image itself is supplied by the fedora-logos package): /usr/share/icons/Fedora/scalable/places/start-here.svg That file is just the logomark (the F bubble), without the "TM"
If we do want the full logo (fedora + bubble) here, i *think* this is the file that should be used (once again the file itself is supplied by the fedora-logos package): /usr/share/fedora-logos/fedora_logo.svg
Can anyone else throw any insight on what logo we should present here?
cheers, ryanlerch
Ryan Lerch (rlerch@redhat.com) said:
On 04/03/2013 10:25 AM, Ryan Lerch wrote:
On 04/03/2013 03:33 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
control-center-3.8.0-2.fc19 added the Fedora logo (instead of the GNOME logo) on the details panel of the GNOME desktop control center. This is a good idea, but I see two problems:
- Use the full logotype, not just the logomark
- The lack of the ™ symbol next to the logomark violates our
own logo usage guidelines [1].
Elad, Thanks for bringing this up!, However, I dont have a functioning f19 machine at the moment, would you be able to upload a screenshot so we can see the logo as it is currently presented?
WE i think we should also just file a bug against this component in Fedora. Is that the correct course of action?
--ryanlerch
After a quick look into the patch that changed the logo, it seems that it is using the following file (the image itself is supplied by the fedora-logos package): /usr/share/icons/Fedora/scalable/places/start-here.svg That file is just the logomark (the F bubble), without the "TM"
Ideally if it's doing that it should pull from the hicolor path, so it can be easily changed by downstream redistibutors without patching the code.
Bill
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Ryan Lerch rlerch@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/03/2013 10:25 AM, Ryan Lerch wrote:
On 04/03/2013 03:33 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
control-center-3.8.0-2.fc19 added the Fedora logo (instead of the GNOME logo) on the details panel of the GNOME desktop control center. This is a good idea, but I see two problems:
- Use the full logotype, not just the logomark
- The lack of the ™ symbol next to the logomark violates our own logo
usage guidelines [1].
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelineshttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines
Elad, Thanks for bringing this up!, However, I dont have a functioning f19 machine at the moment, would you be able to upload a screenshot so we can see the logo as it is currently presented?
WE i think we should also just file a bug against this component in Fedora. Is that the correct course of action?
--ryanlerch
After a quick look into the patch that changed the logo, it seems that it is using the following file (the image itself is supplied by the fedora-logos package): /usr/share/icons/Fedora/**scalable/places/start-here.svg That file is just the logomark (the F bubble), without the "TM"
If we do want the full logo (fedora + bubble) here, i *think* this is the file that should be used (once again the file itself is supplied by the fedora-logos package): /usr/share/fedora-logos/**fedora_logo.svg
Can anyone else throw any insight on what logo we should present here?
cheers, ryanlerch
______________________________**_________________ design-team mailing list design-team@lists.**fedoraproject.orgdesign-team@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/design-**teamhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
I attached the screenshot below. IMO, the full logotype (fedora+bubble) would look *way* better in this screen
On 04/03/2013 02:01 PM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Ryan Lerch <rlerch@redhat.com mailto:rlerch@redhat.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2013 10:25 AM, Ryan Lerch wrote: On 04/03/2013 03:33 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote: control-center-3.8.0-2 <tel:3.8.0-2>.fc19 added the Fedora logo (instead of the GNOME logo) on the details panel of the GNOME desktop control center. This is a good idea, but I see two problems: 1) Use the full logotype, not just the logomark 2) The lack of the ™ symbol next to the logomark violates our own logo usage guidelines [1]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines Elad, Thanks for bringing this up!, However, I dont have a functioning f19 machine at the moment, would you be able to upload a screenshot so we can see the logo as it is currently presented? WE i think we should also just file a bug against this component in Fedora. Is that the correct course of action? --ryanlerch After a quick look into the patch that changed the logo, it seems that it is using the following file (the image itself is supplied by the fedora-logos package): /usr/share/icons/Fedora/scalable/places/start-here.svg That file is just the logomark (the F bubble), without the "TM" If we do want the full logo (fedora + bubble) here, i *think* this is the file that should be used (once again the file itself is supplied by the fedora-logos package): /usr/share/fedora-logos/fedora_logo.svg Can anyone else throw any insight on what logo we should present here? cheers, ryanlerch _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
I attached the screenshot below. IMO, the full logotype (fedora+bubble) would look *way* better in this screen
-- -Elad Alfassa.
That logo (other than the lack of the TM) also looks quite large for the dialog that is displaying it.
Attached is a couple of mockups of a smaller version of just the logo (the bottom mockup), and a version with the logotype as well (the top mockup). IMHO, just the bubble looks better balanced than the logotype because the distroname underneath is centered.
Note that the attached mockups are just visualisations of ideas, and should not be interpreted as a final suggestion to implement.
cheers, ryanlerch
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Ryan Lerch rlerch@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/03/2013 02:01 PM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Ryan Lerch rlerch@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/03/2013 10:25 AM, Ryan Lerch wrote:
On 04/03/2013 03:33 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
control-center-3.8.0-2.fc19 added the Fedora logo (instead of the GNOME logo) on the details panel of the GNOME desktop control center. This is a good idea, but I see two problems:
- Use the full logotype, not just the logomark
- The lack of the ™ symbol next to the logomark violates our own logo
usage guidelines [1].
Elad, Thanks for bringing this up!, However, I dont have a functioning f19 machine at the moment, would you be able to upload a screenshot so we can see the logo as it is currently presented?
WE i think we should also just file a bug against this component in Fedora. Is that the correct course of action?
--ryanlerch
After a quick look into the patch that changed the logo, it seems that it is using the following file (the image itself is supplied by the fedora-logos package): /usr/share/icons/Fedora/scalable/places/start-here.svg That file is just the logomark (the F bubble), without the "TM"
If we do want the full logo (fedora + bubble) here, i *think* this is the file that should be used (once again the file itself is supplied by the fedora-logos package): /usr/share/fedora-logos/fedora_logo.svg
Can anyone else throw any insight on what logo we should present here?
cheers, ryanlerch
design-team mailing list design-team@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
I attached the screenshot below. IMO, the full logotype (fedora+bubble) would look *way* better in this screen
-- -Elad Alfassa.
That logo (other than the lack of the TM) also looks quite large for the dialog that is displaying it.
Attached is a couple of mockups of a smaller version of just the logo (the bottom mockup), and a version with the logotype as well (the top mockup). IMHO, just the bubble looks better balanced than the logotype because the distroname underneath is centered.
Note that the attached mockups are just visualisations of ideas, and should not be interpreted as a final suggestion to implement.
cheers, ryanlerch
-- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
I personally dislike having the release name there. Especially that large, we shouldn't emphasize it.
IMO we should either a) use only the release number and not display the name, which is an internal community injoke and nothing more. b) put the release name and version under the gnome release version, and have the full logomark on the top.
On Wed 03 Apr 2013 02:42:26 PM EDT, Elad Alfassa wrote:
I personally dislike having the release name there. Especially that large, we shouldn't emphasize it.
I agree 100%!
IMO we should either a) use only the release number and not display the name, which is an internal community injoke and nothing more. b) put the release name and version under the gnome release version, and have the full logomark on the top.
If we show the release name at all I think it should be de-emphasized, maybe not just with placement as Elad is suggesting in b above but a smaller font.
~m
On Wed 03 Apr 2013 02:49:14 PM EDT, Máirín Duffy wrote:
On Wed 03 Apr 2013 02:42:26 PM EDT, Elad Alfassa wrote:
I personally dislike having the release name there. Especially that large, we shouldn't emphasize it.
I agree 100%!
I agree also.
IMO we should either a) use only the release number and not display the name, which is an internal community injoke and nothing more. b) put the release name and version under the gnome release version, and have the full logomark on the top.
If we show the release name at all I think it should be de-emphasized, maybe not just with placement as Elad is suggesting in b above but a smaller font.
Also, should the "64-bit" have it's own label-value pair also (like memory, processor, gnome varsion) similar to:
" Architecture: 64-bit "
cheers, ryanlerch
desktop@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org