Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-05-06/workstation.20... Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-05-06/workstation.20... Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-05-06/workstation.20...
================================= #fedora-meeting-2: workstation_wg =================================
Meeting started by mcatanzaro at 13:02:40 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-05-06/workstation.20... .
Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (mcatanzaro, 13:03:05)
* WG membership (mcatanzaro, 13:09:39) * LINK:
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20190506&p1=... (mcatanzaro, 13:27:03) * ACTION: otaylor to continue membership discussion via private email (mcatanzaro, 13:54:25)
* open floor (mcatanzaro, 13:55:53)
Meeting ended at 14:04:30 UTC.
Action Items ------------ * otaylor to continue membership discussion via private email
Action Items, by person ----------------------- * otaylor * otaylor to continue membership discussion via private email * **UNASSIGNED** * (none)
People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * mcatanzaro (68) * petersen (41) * otaylor (22) * langdon (18) * zodbot (15) * kalev (9) * cschalle (7)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 09:13 -0500, mcatanzaro@gnome.org wrote:
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-05-06/workstation.20...
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-05-06/workstation.20...
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-05-06/workstation.20...
<snip>
Just had a read through the minutes. I am happy to be set aside for consideration until a later date (when again new members are needed) and make further contribution via the gnome-SIG if added. The consensus was toward not having too large a WG membership and I agree with that.
Rejection was mentioned. ;-) Not the first time and certainly not the last and my motivation would not falter as part of the gnome-SIG, with all that always needs to be done their.
Regards
Phil
- -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.***
Playing the game for the games sake.
Twitter: kathenasorg IRC: kathenas Web: https://kathenas.org Github: https://github.com/kathenas GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas
GPG: A0C3 4C6A AC2B B8F4 F1E5 EDF4 333F 60DC B0B9 BB77
Hi all,
Any news regarding membership of gnome-sig now workstation-wg new members business is concluded?
Regards
Phil
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 11:39 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 5/31/19 05:44, Phil Wyett wrote:
Hi all,
Any news regarding membership of gnome-sig now workstation-wg new members business is concluded?
Hi Phil,
What's your plan with this? Why do you need the gnome-sig access?
Kalev
Hi,
Giving me gnome-sig access was discussed on IRC if I were not to continue further in the workstation working group membership process this time round and this may keep up motivation[1].
Having access would allow me to do updates etc. (without doing PRs and having them ignored) and become a productive part of supporting the GNOME effort and progressing it.
[1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/workstation/workstation.2019-05-06-1...
Regards
Phil
On 5/31/19 12:22, Phil Wyett wrote:
Having access would allow me to do updates etc. (without doing PRs and having them ignored) and become a productive part of supporting the GNOME effort and progressing it.
Hi Phil,
I think I'd like to continue with the PRs instead. gnome-sig has access to ~300 packages and I don't feel comfortable handing that kind of access to new packagers. Sorry.
Can you send me a list of outstanding PRs you have that the package maintainers have ignored? I'm happy to help get those merged.
Also, thanks for stepping up to be a gnome-maps package co-maintainer, much appreciated! Great work pushing out the latest updates.
Thanks, Kalev
On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 11:47 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 5/31/19 12:22, Phil Wyett wrote:
Having access would allow me to do updates etc. (without doing PRs and having them ignored) and become a productive part of supporting the GNOME effort and progressing it.
Hi Phil,
I think I'd like to continue with the PRs instead. gnome-sig has access to ~300 packages and I don't feel comfortable handing that kind of access to new packagers. Sorry.
Can you send me a list of outstanding PRs you have that the package maintainers have ignored? I'm happy to help get those merged.
Also, thanks for stepping up to be a gnome-maps package co- maintainer, much appreciated! Great work pushing out the latest updates.
Thanks, Kalev
Hi Kalev,
I will put forward PRs, if such a time arises that I choose to contribute any further.
There are no outstanding PRs. All packages were updated by yourself and I subsequently deleted the PRs, so not to leave any of these sat on individual packages and go stale and possibly cause confusion in the future.
Regards
Phil
desktop@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Kalev Lember -
mcatanzaro＠gnome.org -
Phil Wyett