From several previous versions this small problem remains. It is not serious, but a little spoiled aesthetics of gnome-shell.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f9wofzepnhtla4o/blurred_icon_screenshot.png?dl=0
,cheers
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 02:36 -0300, Bastián Díaz wrote:
From several previous versions this small problem remains. It is not serious, but a little spoiled aesthetics of gnome-shell.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f9wofzepnhtla4o/blurred_icon_screenshot.png ?dl=0
,cheers
Bastián Díaz
I suspect a bug in librsvg, since IIRC this icon works fine in Inkscape and Firefox....
Anyway, since the release notes are not an app, they should not be displayed in the shell overview anymore. I wonder why you're seeing them at all.
El 08-10-2015 11:42, Michael Catanzaro escribió:
Anyway, since the release notes are not an app, they should not be displayed in the shell overview anymore. I wonder why you're seeing them at all.
It is not an application, but is a shortcut to the Release Notes and with Dev Help, are distributed with fedora since a time ago.
Independent of the problem that I present, I believe that this access to documentation should be included in the "Utilities" folder.
,Cheers
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Bastián Díaz diaz.bastian@openmailbox.org wrote:
El 08-10-2015 11:42, Michael Catanzaro escribió:
Anyway, since the release notes are not an app, they should not be displayed in the shell overview anymore. I wonder why you're seeing them at all.
It is not an application, but is a shortcut to the Release Notes and with Dev Help, are distributed with fedora since a time ago.
Independent of the problem that I present, I believe that this access to documentation should be included in the "Utilities" folder.
,Cheers
Bastián Díaz
-- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
We've had the discussion in the past and devised a set of guidelines [1], which basically say that since the release note launcher does not launch an app, we should not include it in the default install. If it were to be included, it'd be in the Sundry folder, which is for "stuff that is not actually apps but we can't remove from our default installation for various reasons".
AFAIK, we don't install the release notes by default any more (correct me if I'm wrong). I feel there's a little value in rehashing the same discussion about the release notes we had in previous cycles.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Guidelines/Applications_and_Launc...
El 08-10-2015 13:17, Elad Alfassa escribió:
AFAIK, we don't install the release notes by default any more (correct me if I'm wrong). I feel there's a little value in rehashing the same discussion about the release notes we had in previous cycles.
Mentioned earlier cycles, to refer to blur icon. On the other hand, I'm trying Fedora 23 beta (latest updates) and the icon remains in the view of applications.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Bastián Díaz diaz.bastian@openmailbox.org wrote:
El 08-10-2015 13:17, Elad Alfassa escribió:
AFAIK, we don't install the release notes by default any more (correct me if I'm wrong). I feel there's a little value in rehashing the same discussion about the release notes we had in previous cycles.
Mentioned earlier cycles, to refer to blur icon. On the other hand, I'm trying Fedora 23 beta (latest updates) and the icon remains in the view of applications.
-- Bastián Díaz
Is it a clean install of F23 or did you upgrade? We don't remove stuff you already have installed on upgrades.
It might also be that we install them by default and I simply didn't notice, and if we do they should go to the Sundry folder.
The fact that the icon itself doesn't look good is well known (bugs in various svg rendering libraries) and it's the responsibility of the docs team to ship an icon we can render. I've filed a bug about this in the past: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135114
I guess you either need to re-open it or file a new one if you care about this.
El 08-10-2015 14:23, Elad Alfassa escribió:
Is it a clean install of F23 or did you upgrade? We don't remove stuff you already have installed on upgrades.
It is a clean install. I have an old computer dedicated to testing.
It might also be that we install them by default and I simply didn't notice, and if we do they should go to the Sundry folder.
Perhaps it is something that is fixed in the final version.
The fact that the icon itself doesn't look good is well known (bugs in various svg rendering libraries) and it's the responsibility of the docs team to ship an icon we can render. I've filed a bug about this in the past: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135114 [1]
I draw attention to the bug appears as "solved" in currentrelease.
I guess you either need to re-open it or file a new one if you care about this.
Thank you.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Bastián Díaz diaz.bastian@openmailbox.org wrote:
I draw attention to the bug appears as "solved" in currentrelease.
Yes this is what I said: it's marked as fixed and you need to re-open it or file a new one because clearly it is not fixed.
desktop@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Bastián Díaz -
Elad Alfassa -
Michael Catanzaro