Hey,
I've updated the comps file in Fedora 20 to be more useful to application developers, and bug reporters alike.
This makes "yum install @gnome-software-development" install: - Command-line utilities like diffstat, valgrind, gdb - GNOME developer tools like gitg, gtkparasite - Additional libraries like clutter-gst-devel, polkit-devel - And devel docs for GStreamer, webkit, glib and clutter
Please take a look over the comps-f20.xml file in: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/comps.git/
And let us know if, as GNOME/Fedora developers, there's anything else that ought to be installed by default for budding developers.
Not that this is for application development, not GNOME development itself, so things like totem-pl-parser, grilo, or gnome-online-accounts' devel packages are getting dragged in. Those should be pulled by "yum-builddep" instead, when you hack on a particular package.
Cheers
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Bastien Nocera bnocera@redhat.com wrote:
Hey,
I've updated the comps file in Fedora 20 to be more useful to application developers, and bug reporters alike.
This makes "yum install @gnome-software-development" install:
- Command-line utilities like diffstat, valgrind, gdb
- GNOME developer tools like gitg, gtkparasite
- Additional libraries like clutter-gst-devel, polkit-devel
- And devel docs for GStreamer, webkit, glib and clutter
Please take a look over the comps-f20.xml file in: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/comps.git/
And let us know if, as GNOME/Fedora developers, there's anything else that ought to be installed by default for budding developers.
Not that this is for application development, not GNOME development itself, so things like totem-pl-parser, grilo, or gnome-online-accounts' devel packages are getting dragged in. Those should be pulled by "yum-builddep" instead, when you hack on a particular package.
Cheers
desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
We should probably add gedit-code-assistance and gcc to that group
gcc got dragged in automatically already, and I wanted to avoid making a IDE choice otherwise we'd install gedit-code-assistance, vim-enhanced, emacs, etc.
Anjuta is already in the optional packages in that list.
----- Original Message -----
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Bastien Nocera bnocera@redhat.com wrote:
Hey,
I've updated the comps file in Fedora 20 to be more useful to application developers, and bug reporters alike.
This makes "yum install @gnome-software-development" install:
- Command-line utilities like diffstat, valgrind, gdb
- GNOME developer tools like gitg, gtkparasite
- Additional libraries like clutter-gst-devel, polkit-devel
- And devel docs for GStreamer, webkit, glib and clutter
Please take a look over the comps-f20.xml file in: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/comps.git/
And let us know if, as GNOME/Fedora developers, there's anything else that ought to be installed by default for budding developers.
Not that this is for application development, not GNOME development itself, so things like totem-pl-parser, grilo, or gnome-online-accounts' devel packages are getting dragged in. Those should be pulled by "yum-builddep" instead, when you hack on a particular package.
Cheers
desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
We should probably add gedit-code-assistance and gcc to that group
-- -Elad Alfassa.
-- desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
Bastien Nocera (bnocera@redhat.com) said:
gcc got dragged in automatically already, and I wanted to avoid making a IDE choice otherwise we'd install gedit-code-assistance, vim-enhanced, emacs, etc.
Anjuta is already in the optional packages in that list.
With gnome-software now for app installation, is it worth even having optional packages in this sense, as opposed to just leaving them to be installed with g-s?
Bill
The coverage for installable apps through gnome-software is still pretty limited, and it also depends on whether we want to support the DVD install case, the only case in which having this optional section makes sense.
----- Original Message -----
Bastien Nocera (bnocera@redhat.com) said:
gcc got dragged in automatically already, and I wanted to avoid making a IDE choice otherwise we'd install gedit-code-assistance, vim-enhanced, emacs, etc.
Anjuta is already in the optional packages in that list.
With gnome-software now for app installation, is it worth even having optional packages in this sense, as opposed to just leaving them to be installed with g-s?
Bill
desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
Bastien Nocera (bnocera@redhat.com) said:
The coverage for installable apps through gnome-software is still pretty limited, and it also depends on whether we want to support the DVD install case, the only case in which having this optional section makes sense.
...? Optional packages aren't exposed in the installer since the UI redesign.
Bill
Oh, right. We might as well nuke them then.
----- Original Message -----
Bastien Nocera (bnocera@redhat.com) said:
The coverage for installable apps through gnome-software is still pretty limited, and it also depends on whether we want to support the DVD install case, the only case in which having this optional section makes sense.
...? Optional packages aren't exposed in the installer since the UI redesign.
Bill
desktop mailing list desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
desktop@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Bastien Nocera -
Bill Nottingham -
Elad Alfassa