Hi all,
Just a quick heads up that the 3.37.92 megaupdate is all lined up and queued to F33 updates-testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7f57486c95
This is likely not going to be pushed through the beta freeze, so next week I'll prepare a final .0 release to replace/obsolete the .92 bodhi update.
I'll talk to QA and see how they feel about pulling the .92 update through the beta freeze now that the beta is delayed anyway, but I think the base scenario is that we ship beta without this.
The megaupdate also includes new parallel installable tracker3 and tracker3-miners packages. The naming here was difficult but in the end we ended up keeping tracker 2 in the existing 'tracker' package and creating a new 'tracker3' package that's parallel installable with the old one. This makes it easy to port packages over one by one. In F34 perhaps we can drop tracker 2 and get rid of the separate tracker3 package; let's see how fast app porting goes.
In default Fedora Workstation, we'll have both 'tracker' and 'tracker3' installed by default, but only tracker3 FS miners are going to be started at session login; tracker 2 miners are autostarted when an app requires them. Everything in the default install is ported to tracker3, with the exception of gnome-photos where the upstream port didn't get ready in time.
(I've cross posted this to devel and desktop lists both.)
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 20:49 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick heads up that the 3.37.92 megaupdate is all lined up and queued to F33 updates-testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7f57486c95
For the record, this currently fails openQA tests because the gnome- shell it contains depends on the gnome-settings-daemon from a separate update. This is Officially Bad, but I understand the specific situation here (the other update is an FE fix) and it's reasonable.
Once the FE fix goes stable - it'd be good if someone else could test and +1 it, I did already - I can re-trigger the tests on the mega- update and those failures should go away.
This is likely not going to be pushed through the beta freeze, so next week I'll prepare a final .0 release to replace/obsolete the .92 bodhi update.
I'll talk to QA and see how they feel about pulling the .92 update through the beta freeze now that the beta is delayed anyway, but I think the base scenario is that we ship beta without this.
Yeah. We slipped a week, but we still only have one week from now till the *next* go/no-go date and there's a lot of stuff going on already, so personally my instinct is to leave this bit alone. That's just me personally, though, it's totally fine to propose this as an FE if you want and see what other folks think.
I'll test the update locally and see how it goes. Thanks.
desktop@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Williamson -
Kalev Lember