On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 15:01 +0200, nodata wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 08:47 -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
Michael Schwendt fedora@wir-sind-cool.org wrote:
As a user, being confronted with "just another feature-overloaded
bug
tracker" which contains many new and poorly named and
insufficiently
described "products" and "components" and hundreds of open bug
reports, it
is a very frustrating experience to spend time on _trying_ to help
by
reporting something upstream only to learn that the report is
ignored
or
closed as duplicate or closed as NOTOURBUG or not been looked at
for
many months.
Why not adopt some packages, and help out by keeping an eye on
bugzilla
for them, trying to reproduce bugs, and kick them upstream as needed?
That
way you don't have to learn about many upstream bug trackers, just a few. --
If anyone is interested in that, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Rahul
Isn't this a workaround for bugzilla lacking an easy way to move bugs upstream? Wasn't the XML RPC interface meant to solve this?
Upstream projects use different versions of bugzilla and various other bug tracking systems.
So if upstream uses bugzilla (like kernel and Gnome do), is this possible?
There isnt a universal method of doing it automatically. In some cases XML RPC does help.
Rahul
So I guess this is being worked on?