devel April 2005

devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

234 participants
201 discussions

perl update on x86_64
by Zoltan Kota 30 Apr '05

30 Apr '05

Hi, It seems updating perl on x86_64 is broken. Is it only for me, or should I send it to bugzilla? $ yum update Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.5-11.FC3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.5-9 file /usr/share/man/man1/cpan.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.5-11.FC3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.5-9 ... Zoltan

4 4

Re: 3w-9xxx module version in FC4
by Joshua Baker-LePain 30 Apr '05

30 Apr '05

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 at 10:14am, jkeating(a)j2solutions.net wrote > useful for. The '9.2' release does have significant performance > increases (firmware and driver need to be updated) but I don't think Err, really? I saw exactly the opposite. Now, this was on centos 4, but these numbers are for a software RAID0 across 2 9500-12 cards in 11 disk RAID5 mode. I'd also done 'blockdev --setra 16384' on both 3ware devices, and this is with a kernel modified to include XFS: 9.1.5.2 firmware and stock centos 4 driver (tiobench, units are MB/s): Read, 1 thread: 428.8 Read, 2 thread: 586.7 Read, 4 thread: 541.5 Read, 8 thread: 462.9 Write, 1 thread: 151.7 Write, 2 thread: 156.8 Write, 4 thread: 148.6 Write, 8 thread: 148.5 9.2 firmware and drivers: Read, 1 thread: 433.4 Read, 2 thread: 608.1 Read, 4 thread: 508.6 Read, 8 thread: 398.6 Write, 1 thread: 33.7 Write, 2 thread: 31.6 Write, 4 thread: 31.4 Write, 8 thread: 30.5 The bonnie++ results look even worse: "Old" codeset: Read: 340.6 Write: 173.5 "New" codeset: Read: 134.5 Write: 35.6 -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University

3 3

Re: Plase update tzdata to 2005i
by Antonio Gallardo 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

On Vie, 29 de Abril de 2005, 23:00, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams dijo: > On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 22:45 -0500, Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> On Vie, 29 de Abril de 2005, 21:35, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams dijo: >> > On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 21:11 -0500, Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> >> Is posible to see a patch for FC3 and include it in the next FC4 >> release? >> > >> > Request it in Bugzilla. >> > >> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ >> >> Thanks! Can you provide the bug number? I have problems using the Redhat bugzilla system. Trying to search for tzdata, nicaragua or managua it always retuns "zarro bugs". :-( > > That's because you need to create an account and log the request yourself. I have one and used it to do the search. :-) Please send me the bug number. ;-) Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo. > > -- > Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez(a)ivazquez.net> > http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ > > gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

2 2

Re: Plase update tzdata to 2005i
by Antonio Gallardo 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

On Vie, 29 de Abril de 2005, 21:35, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams dijo: > On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 21:11 -0500, Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> Is posible to see a patch for FC3 and include it in the next FC4 release? > > Request it in Bugzilla. > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks! Can you provide the bug number? I have problems using the Redhat bugzilla system. Trying to search for tzdata, nicaragua or managua it always retuns "zarro bugs". :-( Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo > > -- > Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez(a)ivazquez.net> > http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ > > gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

2 1

simplexml need to be moved to php-xml ?
by Ricardo Ariel Gorosito 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

AFAIK simplexml_import_dom is missing in 'SimpleXML' because DOM is in PHP-XML. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156434

1 0

grub Error 25's after updating kernels
by sean darcy 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

Installing new kernels with yum sometimes causes an Error 25 with grub. I can't see what's wrong with grub.conf. For instance, this grub.conf generates an Error 25: # grub.conf generated by anaconda # #boot=/dev/hda default=4 timeout=10 # splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz # hiddenmenu title Fedora Core (2.6.11-1.1267_FC4) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1267_FC4 root=/dev/hda5 video=radeonfb:1024x768-32@100 initrd /initrd-2.6.11-1.1267_FC4.img title Fedora Core (2.6.11-1.1261_FC4) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1261_FC4 root=/dev/hda5 video=radeonfb:1024x768-32@100 initrd /initrd-2.6.11-1.1261_FC4.img title Fedora Core (2.6.11-1.1258_FC4) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1258_FC4 root=/dev/hda5 video=radeonfb:1024x768-32@100 initrd /initrd-2.6.11-1.1258_FC4.img title Fedora Core (2.6.11-1.1253_FC4) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1253_FC4 root=/dev/hda5 video=radeonfb:1024x768-32@100 initrd /initrd-2.6.11-1.1253_FC4.img title 2.6.12-rc3 root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.12-rc3 root=/dev/hda5 video=radeonfb:1024x768-32@100 title Windows 2000 map (hd0) (hd1) map (hd1) (hd0) rootnoverify (hd1,0) chainloader +1 makeactive boot Thanks to knoppix, I edited it to this, which booted: # grub.conf generated by anaconda # #boot=/dev/hda default=2 timeout=10 # splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz # hiddenmenu title Fedora Core (2.6.11-1.1275_FC4) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1275_FC4 root=/dev/hda5 video=radeonfb:1024x768-32@100 initrd /initrd-2.6.11-1.1275_FC4.img title Fedora Core (2.6.11-1.1267_FC4) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1267_FC4 root=/dev/hda5 video=radeonfb:1024x768-32@100 initrd /initrd-2.6.11-1.1267_FC4.img title 2.6.12-rc3 root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.12-rc3 root=/dev/hda5 video=radeonfb:1024x768-32@100 title Windows 2000 map (hd0) (hd1) map (hd1) (hd0) rootnoverify (hd1,0) chainloader +1 makeactive boot Puzzled. sean

1 0

Now and Xen:Complexities of Fedora,Grub,LVM and Xen
by David Mohring 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

I'm preparing to do an install of FC4t2 and rawhide. I need to port, test and support code to multiple vendors and releases of Linux on the one luggable PC. It's going to be fun trying to get copies of FC3/4,Rawhide, Ubuntu and Debian etc to coexist as differing boot option, let along getting them to run together under Xen. Looking over the Xen documentation ( http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraXenQuickstart ) and skimming though the Xen mailing lists, I have a couple of questions and ideas. First, major questions: a) Whats the chances of a stable ( enough ) Xen making it into the final release of FC4? b) Is it going to be safe/stable/secure for the domain U kernels use LVM mounts? Or are loopback file systems, mounted by the domain 0 kernel, the only effective choice? c) Is it worth allocating swap partitions for domain U systems? Is it safe/possible to use LVM for this? d) Is the combination of X-server/AGP/sound going to available and stable on domain 0 kernels? e) Will the actual performance of the non-test final release kernels approach the performance of the recent Xen demos? f) Will Redhat be back porting Xen domain 0 and U kernels for RHEL 3/4? ( slightly off topic for this list ) Second, minor thoughts: In the past, for multi OS booting I have used multiple primary bootable /boot partitions, one for each distribution, with the MBR grub install selecting and chaining off one of the four partitions. This still effectively limits you to four distros/OSs. Any further OSs require manual merging of the root/initrd/boot info into one of the existing primary partition boot sequences. This works fine but it has a tendency to upsets any SELinux auditing. Is there a better way of doing this? For example have each root FS store the /boot directory on root and hack grub to read off multiple non- primary/LVM partitions. Due to grub/BIOS limitations is it possible? A similar problems occurs when remounting any shared SELinux protected file systems, including /home. "/sbin/restorecon -v -R /home" or "/sbin/fixfiles relabel" solves the problem but defeats the protection. Is it possible to verify the partition based on the previous labeling? Is it possible for different instances of SELinux system to share common labeling for shared partitions? Thirdly, so-so ideas: Have the Fedora Core core developer given any consideration to a single "xen" init.d script which would : 1) Setup the virtual networking for the domain 0 and domain U hosted systems. Virtual bridging + remote DHCP/static addressing OR internal DHCPd + NAT + plus forwarding 2) Allocate file system mount rights on a first come first served basis, with fall over of NFS mounting if the first serves the requested partition. There should be an easier way to configuring the combinations of Fedora,Grub,LVM and Xen than manually editing configure files and CLI launching instances. Multiple root file systems with multiple kernels, each in turn with multiple options for multiple run levels, mount point and services. However, with a little scripted configuration, one OS install and one mounted file system tree, should be able to perform all of the following, one at a time, depending on boot flags and kernel selection. Native without Xen Workstation : Run level 5 Graphical mode. Runs most user applications locally. Can host remote services ( httpd etc ). X-Terminal : Run level 4? LTSP like thin graphical client. Runs most user applications remotely. Server : Run level 3 Text mode. Runs most user applications locally. hosts remote services. Repair : Run level 2 Text mode Root login only. Does not host remote services. Xen domain 0 Xen + Domain 0 Workstation : Run level 5 Graphical mode ( assuming that AGP is compatible ) Should operate same as native workstation Xen + Domain 0 X-Terminal : Run level 4? Graphical mode ( assuming that AGP is compatible ) Can also log into local domain U servers. Xen + Domain 0 Server : Run level 3 Text mode, Xen + Domain 0 Monitor : Run level 2? Text mode. Minimal Xen host setup, plus network support. Runs user application and services on domain U servers NOTE : whatever runlevel the Xen domain 0 is running it would still host/run the "xen" init.d Xen0 services. Xen domain U Note only two. Domain U Server : Run level 3 Domain U Repair : Run level 2 It would require a lot of modifications to the existing init.d scripts which would each have to take into account the virtual mode NATIVE | Xen0 | XenU But the overall result would be well worth it. Lastly. Any word on getting a version of Anaconda to work under Domain U Server level? Ie VNCserver mode with the domain 0 host granting lvm partition/group access. -- David Mohring <heretic(a)ihug.co.nz>

3 2

RE: Running a domU with FC4 release 1268?
by Jeffrey Buell 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

> With release 1240 I was able to follow pretty closely the > QuickStart guide > and get a domU running. Now with release 1268 I follow the > same procedure > and get dom0 up, but 'xm create -c base' immediately crashes > with the message > > unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 8b04ec93 > > Any ideas what may be wrong? Has anybody else used Xen with > release 1268? Anybody running Xen on FC4 devel? I updated to release 1275 and now domU boots and gives a login prompt, but in response to "root" I get this message: login: no shell: permission denied Is this another bug or is something else going on? Jeff

2 1

How to run a swt program?
by Yuan Yijun 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

I don't know how to run a swt program after I upgraded libswt3-gtk2 to 3.1M6. There is 1 article in this list, and 2 articles about this, on gcj wiki and classpath wiki respectively. (I found them through googling ".jar.so".) But I still cannot run a swt program, with the steps described in these documents. If --cp contains only my jar, gcj prompts that it cannot find some class definitions which are in swt. If not specify -Djava.library.path, gcj prompts that it cannot find libswt-pi-gtk-...so, which is not contained in libswt3-gtk2 rpm, but I still can locate it from /usr/share/eclipse/configurations/...... Then what do the class map.db files do? Would anyone please help me out? Thanks very much!

2 1

rhnlib _xmlrpclib rename
by Alan Milligan 29 Apr '05

29 Apr '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've discovered a problem with up2date registration of hardware profiles. up2date-4.4.9-1 crashes because xmlrpclib's Marshaller isn't marshalling nulls. I'm running against python-2.3.4-11 and rhnlib-1.8-7.p23, where I note some comment that _xmlrpclib.py was renamed to _internal_xmlrpclib.py. I think that somewhere in this change, that this hasn't been properly linked into the xmlrpclib.FastMarshaller and that the marshaller assigned to xmlrpclib now does not have __allow_none set. I somehow doubt that Python's xmlrpclib.py has changed between version 2.3 and 2.4, and was wondering if someone could shed some light on this before investigating further (than hacking rhnlib.rpclib's Marshalling ctor to set __allow_none that is...) Alan. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCcmjkCfroLk4EZpkRAgOYAKC5/jdhECHLTCGY+NiPdTPVXW3n/ACgwEQD yL2jZZTHegipvOvcnDktOVw= =oK28 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel April 2005