devel July 2011

devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

285 participants
248 discussions

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)
by Marc Grimme 27 Jul '11

27 Jul '11

----- "Toshio Kuratomi" <a.badger(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:56:36PM +0200, Marc Grimme wrote: > > ----- "Bill Nottingham" <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > Orphan comoonics-base-py > > > comaintained by: elcody02 > > I'm co maintaining this package and it is required for the packages > comoonics-cdsl-py and comoonics-cluster-py. > > Sorry but it didn't came to my attention that this package is > orphaned. > > Can I do something to move it to a proper state? (pickup, ..) > > > Visit: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/comoonics-base-py > Login. > Click the buttons to take over ownership of the package on Fedora > releases > that you care about. I've done this but could not take over the ownership for Fedora-devel. It's still orphaned there. I also got reminders from rawhide that the dependent packages could not be built because of the dependency comoonics-base-py being not available. Can I do something about it? Thanks for your help Marc. ______________________________________________________________________________ Marc Grimme E-Mail: grimme(a)atix.de

2 1

Fedora 15 for IBM System z 64bit official release
by Dan Horák 27 Jul '11

27 Jul '11

It's been a longer time since the Fedora 15 release for the primary architectures than we expected, but here we are. As today, the Fedora IBM System z (s390x) Secondary Arch team proudly presents the Fedora 15 for IBM System z 64bit official release! And without further ado, here the links to the actual release: http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/15/Fedora/… http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/15/Everyth… and obviously on all mirrors that mirror the secondary arch content. The first directory contains the normal installation trees as well as one DVD ISO with the complete release. Everything as usual contains, well, everything. :) For Fedora 14 we have collected a couple of example config files, kickstart examples and a nice README here: http://secondary.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/spins/S390/ beware that currently the content there is outdated, but most of the information should be still valid. We're working on fixing that over the next weeks. Additional information about know issues, the current progress and state for future release, where and how the team can be reached and just anything else IBM System z on Fedora related can be found here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/s390x/15 for architecture specific release notes and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/s390x Thanks go out to everyone involved in making this happen! Your Fedora/s390x Maintainers -- Dan Horák, RHCE Senior Software Engineer, BaseOS Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99, 612 45 Brno

1 0

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)
by Fabian Deutsch 27 Jul '11

27 Jul '11

> ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----- > Von: Peter Robinson > Gesendet: 27.07.11 10:09 Uhr > An: Development discussions related to Fedora > Betreff: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning) > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch(a)gmx.de>wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 11:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham: > > > Fabian Deutsch (fabian.deutsch(a)gmx.de) said: > > > > It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost: > > > > I can take > > > > > > > > > Orphan link-grammar > > > > > > It's not a matter of can you; you need to go to pkgdb to claim it. (Sorry > > > if the original mail didn't make this clear.) > > > > I actually requested all rights, but there is still the notice: awaiting > > review. > > > > > Yes, because it happened after the deadline and has hence been blocked in > yesterday's rawhide. I actually requested all rights nearly two weeks ago, the problem was apparently, that I missed the "claim" button. or that it wasn't there yet. thanks - fabian

1 0

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)
by Fabian Deutsch 27 Jul '11

27 Jul '11

Hello, It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost: I can take > Orphan link-grammar - fabian

3 3

Naming
by Nathan O. 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

I am probably going to try and package Peerguardian, and the question is what should I name it, because the tarball is named pgl_noGUI. should I name it pgl, pgl_nogui, pgl-console or possibly just peerguardian?

1 0

Agenda for July 25 FESCo meeting
by Bill Nottingham 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting on 2011-07-25 at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #563 suggested policy: all daemons must set RELRO and PIE flags .fesco 563 #topic #615 Strategy for services that do not have systemd native unit files .fesco 615 = New business = #topic #650 May DBUS autostart? .fesco 650 #topic #651 Updated installation/live image needed .fesco 651 = Fedora Engineering Services tickets = https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/report/6 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

2 3

Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??
by Tom Lane 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

In https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd I read that conversion of a package using a SysV initscript to systemd units requires a trigger with a "< NEVR" condition, and that # Note: the NEVR in trigger scripts should all be the version in # which the package switched to systemd unit files and the comparision # should be less than. Using <= the last version with the sysV script won't # work for several reasons: # 1) disttag is different between Fedora releases # 2) An update in an old Fedora release may create a newer NEVR # Note that this means an update in an older Fedora release must be NEVR # lower than this. Freezing the version and release of the old package and # using a number after the disttag is one way to do this. Example: # httpd-1.0-1%{?dist} => httpd-1.0-1%{?dist}.1 IOW, once I push a mysql update with native systemd support into rawhide, I'll be forbidden from ever rebasing mysql in F15 up to a newer upstream patch release. Considering that upstream issues bug-fix releases about once a month, this is hardly acceptable. I'll have the same problem with postgresql, too. What's seeming like a better option is to bump the package's Epoch for the systemd-native release. Discuss. regards, tom lane

6 12

Sparc test machine
by Sergio Belkin 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

I'd like to port UpTools package to sparc architecture. By chance is some test sparc machine there running Fedora? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org

1 0

TBB (Threading Building Blocks) rebase
by Petr Machata 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

Hi there, I rebased TBB to 3.0. This should even be ABI-stable release--upstream didn't bump the SONAME, and I verified that no ABI-looking symbols disappeared. Thanks, PM

1 0

Self Introduction
by Simon Thompson 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

Hi, My name's Simon, I'm a sys admin/developer type in Computer Science at University of Birmingham. We've got a couple of hundred workstations running variants of SL6/CentOS and I'd done various bits and pieces packaging up software to support our teaching here. Along with rebuilding stuff from Fedora which isn't in EPEL to get software working. My job is to support teaching and research of Computer Science and getting the stuff we need to work in a sane environment. I've just posted a package review request for Gazebo (robotics simulator) at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725752 Simon

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
25
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel July 2011