Hello,
I co-maintain a package that contains a library that is used as module
for a server.
The 32 bits version of this library is pushed automatically into the 64
bits repositories (i.e. in epel6),
which doesn't make much sense, since the 64 bits version of the server
won't run with the 32 bits
libraries.
This wouldn't be a big problem, but the pushed 32 bits rpm has a dependency
on the 32 bits server, so then I will get complains (with reason) about
the broken package.
globus-gridftp-server-progs is the server, and dpm-dsi is the module.
So my question is: how should I approach this? I got some suggestions in
this ticket
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957588
Is there any way I can prevent this rpm from being copied into the 64
bits repositories?
Regards.
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-05-06
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again today/tomorrow! We'll check in on the status of
Beta, and jreznik also wanted to consider the question of what we should
about critical issues in secondary arches during freezes.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130506
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 19 Beta status/planning
3. Secondary arch freeze exceptions
4. Test Days
5. Open floor
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
test-announce mailing list
test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
On Sun, 5 May 2013 09:38:10 +0100
Frank Murphy <frankly3d(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Never mind
man nfs: sharecache / nosharecache
--
Regards,
Frank - I check for new mail every 20min
www.frankly3d.com
Hi,
I am seeking for a reviewer for jimtcl - A small embeddable Tcl
interpreter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959747
If anyone is willing to review this, I am happy to review a package of
him/her instead.
Regards
Markus