Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-04-01 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #1552 Review of delayed Changes for F24
.fesco 1552
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1552
= New business =
#topic #1562 drop exception to proven packager access to packages
.fesco 1562
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1562
#topic #1563 "Rich Dependencies" vs. DNF vs. YUM issues
.fesco 1563
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1563
#topic #1565 Fedora schedule must continue to track core library ABI or
risk serious ABI implications.
.fesco 1565
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1565
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the following meeting.
I get this causing a failed build on fedora-22-ppc64le but the package
builds OK on x86. Can anyone suggest why and what to do about it? If
it's due to the build procedure, it's buried in cmake, which is pretty
much beyond my ken...
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/libomp_oss/src && /usr/bin/perl /builddir/build/BUILD/libomp_oss/tools/check-depends.pl --os=lin --arch=ppc64le --expected="libdl.so.2,libgcc_s.so.1,libc.so.6,ld64.so.1,libpthread.so.0" /builddir/build/BUILD/libomp_oss/src/libiomp5.so
check-depends.pl: (i) Dependencies:
check-depends.pl: (i) ld64.so.2
check-depends.pl: (i) libc.so.6
check-depends.pl: (i) libdl.so.2
check-depends.pl: (i) libpthread.so.0
check-depends.pl: (x) Unexpected dependencies:
check-depends.pl: (x) ld64.so.2
src/CMakeFiles/libomp-test-deps.dir/build.make:64: recipe for target 'src/test-deps/.success' failed
The failed build is currently under
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/loveshack/livhpc/fedora-22-…
Dear all,
Packagers, members of the fedorabugs group and people having a 'watchbugzilla'
ACL in pkgdb must have a bugzilla account attached to the email they set in the
Fedora Account System (FAS).
This is mandatory to allow ACLs to be propagated from pkgdb to bugzilla, allowing
the right person to be made assignee or to be cc'ed on bug reports of packages.
There are currently a few users who are not following this rule and have not
been for quite a while, despite our attempts to contact them:
* jackprice, FAS email: jackprice -- outlook.com
watches 1 package
* vjancik, FAS email: viktor.vix.jancik -- gmail.com
co-maintains¹ 68 packages
watches 1 package
* mstuchli, FAS email: matej.stuchlik -- gmail.com
POC of 14 packages
co-maintains 18 packages
* ferbncode, FAS email: suyashgargsfam -- gmail.com
watches 2 packages
* jangernert, FAS email: janlukasgernert -- freenet.de
watches 1 package
If anyone knows how to reach to them and could either send them to us, the
Fedora infrastructure team, or directly ask them to create a bugzilla account
associated to the email they set in FAS, it would be highly appreciated.
If nothing changes in the coming days, we will drop their ACLs in pkgdb.
Thanks for your help and understanding,
Pierre
for the Fedora Infrastructure team
¹ This number includes packages on which the user may have `watch*` ACLs