devel October 2020

devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

226 participants
409 discussions

Orphaning 'hub' (the git wrapper for Github)
by Stephen Gallagher 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Upstream is slowly dying out, since the official Github CLI[1] was announced. The latest upstream release doesn't pass the test suite on Golang 1.15[2] and I don't have the time to spare these days, so I'm going to orphan it and let someone else take over. [1] https://cli.github.com/ [2] https://github.com/github/hub/issues/2616

3 3

FedoraRespin-32-updates-20201001.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Missing expected images: Xfce live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 4/37 (x86_64) ID: 683018 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/683018 ID: 683034 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/683034 ID: 683042 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/683042 ID: 683045 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/683045 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/37 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 683016 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/683016 ID: 683029 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/683029 Passed openQA tests: 31/37 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

F33 update stuck for past 6 days in request for testing->stable
by Tony Asleson 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

This release: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4da598e74b has been stuck waiting to get moved to stable. Is some error going on that isn't evident? This was a release that I did to hopefully correct what is discussed here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org… Thanks, -Tony

7 14

splitting out systemd-networkd, systemd-standalone-{sysusers,tmpfiles} subpackages in F33+
by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Hi, the systemd package is getting a systemd-networkd subpackage split out that will contain systemd-networkd, networkctl, and the associated data files. This was requested by coreos maintainers: NetworkManager is used and skipping systemd-networkd allows the installation footprint and potential user confusion to be reduced a bit. (By 1.6 MB and an unknown amount, respectively.) Appropriate Obsoletes are added on both the main package and the new systemd-networkd subpackage, so the systemd-networkd subpackage should be installed on upgrades. In addition, the new subpackage has Recommends from the main package, so it will be installed in normal installations. The split affects installations with --setopt=install_weak_deps=False. Please make sure to pull in systemd-networkd.rpm independently if needed. Also note that systemd-networkd.service was preset as *disabled* in Fedora, which means that unless it was enabled by the user, the removal of systemd-networkd wouldn't have an effect. In addition, two more new subpackages are created: systemd-standalone-sysusers and systemd-standalone-tmpfiles, with custom-linked systemd-sysusers and systemd-tmpfiles binaries. They packages are 170kB and 260kB and pull in much less dependencies compared to the normal systemd package (only glibc, libselinux, and libacl). The goal here is to be able to use those packages in limited environments where systemd itself is not necessary. The main systemd systemd package Obsoletes the -standalone- packages, so it should smoothly replace them whenever it is pulled in. This change was done in systemd-246.6-2.fc34 in rawhide right now. (There are some cleanups to move more files to the -networkd subpackage in the works for 246.6-3.fc34). Please give this a spin and report any issues. The plan is to also do this split for F33 if no issues are noted in rawhide. Zbyszek

17 42

Proven packager help needed to merge libevent 2.1.12 side tag
by Ondřej Lysoněk 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Hi, So all the required rebuilds for the libevent 2.1.12 rebase should be done now in the side tag. I've tried to merge the side tag by creating an update in Bodhi as described in [1], but Bodhi tells me 'olysonek does not have commit access rights to ...'. So I guess I'll need proven packager help again. Can someone please merge the f34-build-side-30069 side tag? Thanks! [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/#_how_does… Ondrej Lysonek

3 8

Planned Outage - pagure.io - 2020-10-01 08:00 UTC
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

There will be an outage starting at 2020-10-01 08:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2020-10-01 08:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We are moving the service to a new server running RHEL8 and python3. Affected Services: pagure.io pagure.org Ticket Link: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9355 Please join #fedora-admin or #fedora-noc on irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above. _______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapr…

3 3

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 05th October
by Purusharth Saxena 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting next week on *Monday 05th October at 1300UTC* in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro The channel is bridged to Telegram, so you can also join us there on the @NeuroFedora group: https://t.me/NeuroFedora You can convert the meeting time to your local time using this command in a terminal: $ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1300 next Mon' or you can use this link: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=NeuroFedora+Mee... The meeting will be chaired by @purusharths. The agenda for the meeting is: - New introductions and roll call. - Tasks from last week's meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2020-09-21/neurofedora.202... - Open Pagure tickets: https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issues?status=Open&tags=S%3A+... - Open bugs check: https://tinyurl.com/neurofedora-bugs - CompNeuro lab compose a status check for F33/F34. - Neuroscience query of the week. - Next meeting day, and chair. - Open floor. We hope to see you there! You can learn more about NeuroFedora here: https://neuro.fedoraproject.org -- Thanks & Regards, Purusharth S (He / Him / His) Time zone: Asia/Kolkata

1 1

Discussion: unixODBC - move unversioned *.so files back to unixODBC-devel package
by Ondrej Dubaj 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Hello everyone, I would like to start a discussion about moving unversioned *.so files back to unixODBC-devel package, as they are currently in the main package. The reason for this discussion is primary have things in order according to future rhel-9. There will potentially be a change of moving 5 files {libodbc.so libodbcinst.so libodbcpsqlS.so libodbcmyS.so libtdsS.so} to devel package, so from the maintainers/users perspective, dependent packages will have to require also the devel package and should be rebuild as well. No other changes will be made. There seemed to be no big reason for moving the libraries to the main package in the past, so I consider f34 as a good candidate for such a change. It would be great, if you share your opinions and concerns for this topic. Sharing also the official documentation [1], tracker in bugzilla [2] and upcoming changes in unixODBC package [3] Thanks! Ondrej [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877720 [3] https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/odubaj/rpms/unixODBC/c/7ecddca7cfcc4e014…

7 13

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201001.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200930.0): ID: 682197 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/682197 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel October 2020