2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) forum@hubbitus.com.ru
About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick - http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg736218.html So, upstream is not carefully there and I never can't guarantee what there no ABI breakage in any update...
P.S. It seams it does not hit list, i post mail again. It is reason such big delay...
--
Normally, if the update is a pure bugfix release, it's safe to update and don't need a rebuild, and you should update them on rawhide as well as stable branches to fix bugs
If API/ABI is changed, only the following packages need a rebuild. Packages depends on ImageMagick itself actually don't need a rebuild even the API is changed. repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick-c++ ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686 ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64 inkscape-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64 ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64 gdl-0:0.9-0.12.rc4.fc14.x86_64 pfstools-imgmagick-0:1.8.1-1.fc14.x86_64 drawtiming-0:0.7.1-1.1.fc14.x86_64 pfstools-0:1.8.1-1.fc14.x86_64 ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686 k3d-0:0.8.0.1-1.fc14.x86_64 gdl-python-0:0.9-0.12.rc4.fc14.x86_64 inkscape-view-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64
BTW, some subpackages contain .la files, you should remove them in %install. e.g. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1858222
Regards, Chen Lei