Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 08:38:51AM -0500, Eric Warnke wrote:
ElectricFence - Development only nothing depends on it - 1 objection, but I still say it's usage does not justify it remaining in core - there is at least one competing package ( dmalloc, valgrind )
valgrind is i386 only (therefore not a replacement for efence) and dmalloc is far worse then efence. If anything needs to be dumped to Extras, then it is dmalloc, not ElectricFence.
Yes yes yes and yes.