On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 19:14 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 19:04, seth vidal wrote:
I don't think talking about whether or not we like them is useful here. It is the fhs and fedora core should be compliant with it.
There are plenty of standards out there that are just silly, so compliance for the sake of compliance is probably not the best approach.
How about fhs compliance is something that other distros will have and therefore fedora core should have it too.
We should aim for LSB N compliance. If the LSB N does specify FHS X.Y compliance then that is what it takes to be LSB N compliant.
I do hope the LSB team specifies FHS versions as it seems FHS is going to make life harder instead of easier with each new version.
Hugo.