On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:04:59 +0100, Kevin wrote:
What's wrong with ABRT?
My main beef with it is that it reports its crashes to the downstream bug tracker when really the right people to fix them are the upstream developers. KCrash/DrKonqi is much better there.
Well, upstream would want detailed backtraces, too.
$ grep "Debuginfo absent" attachment.cgi?id=381101 | wc -l 188 $ grep "No symb" attachment.cgi?id=381101 | wc -l 64
Those 188+64 lines are half of the backtrace attachment already $ cat attachment.cgi?id=381101 | wc -l 517
| Debuginfo absent: 0011710bbf8990924b6dd2b256219d5682db6515
Instead of logging 188 missing debuginfo hashes which isn't useful, better log human-readable package EVRs. That would tell more about what package versions a reporter used.