Dear Fedorians,
goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the time Fedora 17 ships, so putting this into rawhide now would allow for plenty of time to iron out any potential problems. Missing the alpha change deadline [3] most likely means we need to wait until Fedora 18.
Regards, Julian
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757054 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757053 [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/17/Schedule
Julian Sikorski (belegdol@gmail.com) said:
Dear Fedorians,
goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the time Fedora 17 ships, so putting this into rawhide now would allow for plenty of time to iron out any potential problems. Missing the alpha change deadline [3] most likely means we need to wait until Fedora 18.
Is it relatively API stable?
Bill
W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze:
Julian Sikorski (belegdol@gmail.com) said:
Dear Fedorians,
goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the time Fedora 17 ships, so putting this into rawhide now would allow for plenty of time to iron out any potential problems. Missing the alpha change deadline [3] most likely means we need to wait until Fedora 18.
Is it relatively API stable?
Bill
I asked Jean Brefort, one of goffice developers:
<belegdol> hi jean, I got asked if goffice is relatively api-stable <jean> not yet <jean> but I'd say mostly <belegdol> may i quote you on that? <jean> we intend to add placehoders for more members on exported classes <jean> of course, you can quote me
Regards, Julian
W dniu 28.11.2011 17:52, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze:
Julian Sikorski (belegdol@gmail.com) said:
Dear Fedorians,
goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the time Fedora 17 ships, so putting this into rawhide now would allow for plenty of time to iron out any potential problems. Missing the alpha change deadline [3] most likely means we need to wait until Fedora 18.
Is it relatively API stable?
Bill
I asked Jean Brefort, one of goffice developers:
<belegdol> hi jean, I got asked if goffice is relatively api-stable <jean> not yet <jean> but I'd say mostly <belegdol> may i quote you on that? <jean> we intend to add placehoders for more members on exported classes <jean> of course, you can quote me
Regards, Julian
I am going to go ahead and commit this. In case packages cannot be fixed in time, we can always introduce compat-goffice.
Julian
Julian Sikorski (belegdol@gmail.com) said:
W dniu 28.11.2011 17:52, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze:
Julian Sikorski (belegdol@gmail.com) said:
Dear Fedorians,
goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the time Fedora 17 ships, so putting this into rawhide now would allow for plenty of time to iron out any potential problems. Missing the alpha change deadline [3] most likely means we need to wait until Fedora 18.
Is it relatively API stable?
Bill
I asked Jean Brefort, one of goffice developers:
<belegdol> hi jean, I got asked if goffice is relatively api-stable <jean> not yet <jean> but I'd say mostly <belegdol> may i quote you on that? <jean> we intend to add placehoders for more members on exported classes <jean> of course, you can quote me
Regards, Julian
I am going to go ahead and commit this. In case packages cannot be fixed in time, we can always introduce compat-goffice.
Julian
devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Julian Sikorski (belegdol@gmail.com) said:
I am going to go ahead and commit this. In case packages cannot be fixed in time, we can always introduce compat-goffice.
I missed the fact that goffice-0.9 is the GTK3 port. So, yes, I'm going to need the compat version. I'll file the package review.
Bill
Bill Nottingham (notting@redhat.com) said:
Julian Sikorski (belegdol@gmail.com) said:
I am going to go ahead and commit this. In case packages cannot be fixed in time, we can always introduce compat-goffice.
I missed the fact that goffice-0.9 is the GTK3 port. So, yes, I'm going to need the compat version. I'll file the package review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783268 if someone is really bored and would like to review it.
Bill
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 10:03 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 28.11.2011 17:52, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze:
Julian Sikorski (belegdol@gmail.com) said:
Dear Fedorians,
goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the time Fedora 17 ships, so putting this into rawhide now would allow for plenty of time to iron out any potential problems. Missing the alpha change deadline [3] most likely means we need to wait until Fedora 18.
Is it relatively API stable?
Bill
I asked Jean Brefort, one of goffice developers:
<belegdol> hi jean, I got asked if goffice is relatively api-stable <jean> not yet <jean> but I'd say mostly <belegdol> may i quote you on that? <jean> we intend to add placehoders for more members on exported classes <jean> of course, you can quote me
Regards, Julian
I am going to go ahead and commit this. In case packages cannot be fixed in time, we can always introduce compat-goffice.
Julian
I realize that this is a bit late, but would you please file a Feature page on goffice 0.10? This seems like a pretty noteworthy upgrade. It's worth having it mentioned prominently in the release notes and talking points.
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Bill Nottingham -
Julian Sikorski -
Stephen Gallagher