I've got this patch to subversion.spec that allows optional building of javahl bindings with a variable-specified JDK path. I've built it as I need Subclipse to work. What do you all think?
-- Pedro Lamarão
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 11:39 -0200, Pedro Lamarão wrote:
I've got this patch to subversion.spec that allows optional building of javahl bindings with a variable-specified JDK path. I've built it as I need Subclipse to work. What do you all think?
You may be able to get buy without having to explicitly set the path to the JDK if you use the jpackage.org JVM setup. It makes use of the alternatives system so my /usr/bin/java winds up pointing to /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.5.0-sun/bin/java. Since RH is working with the jpackage.org folks, it may be a good way to go.
Just a thought.
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 11:39 -0200, Pedro Lamarão wrote:
I've got this patch to subversion.spec that allows optional building of javahl bindings with a variable-specified JDK path. I've built it as I need Subclipse to work. What do you all think?
I modified this patch to build javahl unconditionally with java-gcj- compat.
I hit a couple of stumbling blocks. I think fitzsim is fixing one of them in java-gcj-compat (symlinking GCC's jni.h into java-gcj-compat's JAVA_HOME), and this one in gcjh:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19742
Otherwise, it builds just fine. Hopefully both of these will be taken care of in short order.
AG
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org