Updated Packages:
evolution-2.0.2-3 ----------------- * Fri Oct 22 2004 David Malcolm dmalcolm@redhat.com - 2.0.2-3
- added requirement on gnutls/gnutls-devel
* Fri Oct 22 2004 David Malcolm dmalcolm@redhat.com - 2.0.2-2
- Fix for #132050 (no entry for Evolution in the menus): use the new redhat-evolution.desktop file provided by redhat-menus-1.13
* Tue Oct 12 2004 David Malcolm dmalcolm@redhat.com - 2.0.2-1
- Update from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2 - Updated dependency on e-d-s from 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 - Updated dependency on libgal2 from 2.2.2 to 2.2.3 - Updated dependency on gtkhtml3 from 3.3.0 to 3.3.2 - ppc's mozilla dependency is now in line with the other architectures at 1.7.3
kernel-2.6.9-1.643 ------------------ * Fri Oct 22 2004 Dave Jones davej@redhat.com
- Selected bits from 2.6.9-ac3 - Fix syncppp/async ppp problems with new hangup - Fix broken parport_pc unload - Stop i8xx_tco making some boxes reboot on load - Fix cpia/module tools deadlock - Security fix for smbfs leak/overrun
* Thu Oct 21 2004 Dave Jones davej@redhat.com
- Misc security fixes from 2.6.9-ac2
* Wed Oct 20 2004 Dave Jones davej@redhat.com
- Fix ia64 module loading. (#136365) - Enable discontigmem for PPC64 - Disable a bunch of useless PPC config options - Enable PACK_STACK on s390.
libgal2-2.2.3-3 --------------- * Fri Oct 22 2004 David Malcolm dmalcolm@redhat.com - 2:2.2.3-3
- rebuilt
* Thu Oct 21 2004 David Malcolm dmalcolm@redhat.com
- rebuilt
postgresql-7.4.6-1.FC3.1 ------------------------ * Sat Oct 23 2004 Tom Lane tgl@redhat.com 7.4.6-1
- Update to PostgreSQL 7.4.6 (bugs 136947, 136949) - Make init script more paranoid about mkdir step of initializing a new database (bugs 136947, 136949)
* Wed Oct 20 2004 Tom Lane tgl@redhat.com 7.4.5-4
- Remove contrib/oidjoins stuff from installed fileset; it's of no use to ordinary users and has a security issue (bugs 136300, 136301) - adjust chkconfig priority (bug 128852)
rpmdb-fedora-3-0.20041026 -------------------------
system-config-securitylevel-1.4.14-1 ------------------------------------ * Mon Oct 25 2004 Dan Walsh dwalsh@redhat.com 1.4.14-1
- fix creation of relabel
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:40 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:52:44AM -0400, Build System wrote:
Updated Packages:
Is this post-FC3 stuff or will (parts) appear in FC3 final?
rawhide is still pointed at the FC3 trunk... although that will probably change very soon
Jeremy
Jeremy Katz katzj@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:40 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:52:44AM -0400, Build System wrote:
Updated Packages:
Is this post-FC3 stuff or will (parts) appear in FC3 final?
rawhide is still pointed at the FC3 trunk... although that will probably change very soon
<rant>So an update to an Evoltion bugfix release is ok, an update to a KDE bugfix release two(?) weeks earlier is not. Great.</rant>
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 16:14 +0200, Frank Schmitt wrote:
Jeremy Katz katzj@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:40 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:52:44AM -0400, Build System wrote:
Updated Packages:
Is this post-FC3 stuff or will (parts) appear in FC3 final?
rawhide is still pointed at the FC3 trunk... although that will probably change very soon
<rant>So an update to an Evoltion bugfix release is ok, an update to a KDE bugfix release two(?) weeks earlier is not. Great.</rant>
The updated evolution package isn't an update to a new version. It's an updated build with a specific, small, targeted fix for a specific bug that had been filed and was on the blocker list for the release.
If evolution were updated to version 2.0.3, then you could rant :)
Jeremy
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 10:27 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 16:14 +0200, Frank Schmitt wrote:
Jeremy Katz katzj@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:40 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:52:44AM -0400, Build System wrote:
Updated Packages:
Is this post-FC3 stuff or will (parts) appear in FC3 final?
rawhide is still pointed at the FC3 trunk... although that will probably change very soon
<rant>So an update to an Evoltion bugfix release is ok, an update to a KDE bugfix release two(?) weeks earlier is not. Great.</rant>
The updated evolution package isn't an update to a new version. It's an updated build with a specific, small, targeted fix for a specific bug that had been filed and was on the blocker list for the release.
If evolution were updated to version 2.0.3, then you could rant :)
I think he complains (and complained earlier) about evo being updated to 2.0.2 in the first place.
Nils
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 13:07 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 10:27 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 16:14 +0200, Frank Schmitt wrote:
Jeremy Katz katzj@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:40 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:52:44AM -0400, Build System wrote:
Updated Packages:
Is this post-FC3 stuff or will (parts) appear in FC3 final?
rawhide is still pointed at the FC3 trunk... although that will probably change very soon
<rant>So an update to an Evoltion bugfix release is ok, an update to a KDE bugfix release two(?) weeks earlier is not. Great.</rant>
The updated evolution package isn't an update to a new version. It's an updated build with a specific, small, targeted fix for a specific bug that had been filed and was on the blocker list for the release.
If evolution were updated to version 2.0.3, then you could rant :)
I think he complains (and complained earlier) about evo being updated to 2.0.2 in the first place.
The update from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2 happened on October 12th and has been in Rawhide for over two weeks; I'm not sure why it appeared in this rawhide report (I'd have to look at the code that generates them). It was a bugfix release. It didn't introduce new features, and upstream claims the update fixes 34 bugs (including at least one that was filed in the blockers for FC3 in our bugzilla, off the top of my head).
The recent changes (2.0.2-2 and 2.0.2-3) were, as Jeremy says, small and targeted.
Nils
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@redhat.com"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
Jeremy Katz wrote:
rawhide is still pointed at the FC3 trunk... although that will probably change very soon
Is that likely to be before or after FC3 final release?
The testing tree isn't as extensively mirrored as rawhide so I (and probably others) am tracking rawhide until FC3 final is out. A little note to tell people when rawhide breaks ranks would be very useful :-)
I guess another way around this would be to fold the testing tree into download.fedora.redhat.com so it's mirrored along with the rest.
Under /pub/fedora/linux/core/test/notquiteasrawahide perhaps?
Carwyn
Carwyn Edwards wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
rawhide is still pointed at the FC3 trunk... although that will probably change very soon
Is that likely to be before or after FC3 final release?
The testing tree isn't as extensively mirrored as rawhide so I (and probably others) am tracking rawhide until FC3 final is out. A little note to tell people when rawhide breaks ranks would be very useful :-)
I guess another way around this would be to fold the testing tree into download.fedora.redhat.com so it's mirrored along with the rest.
Under /pub/fedora/linux/core/test/notquiteasrawahide perhaps?
Carwyn
I've been using rawhide to keep my FC3 test uptodate as well, is there actually a seperate test tree, where? And will this stay as "stable" as the current testing tree, it will it destabalise when FC4 starts development.
IOW, I don't mind a little bleeding edge, FC3 test has been great, but I don't want the old rawhide days back, what tree should I point uptodate and yum at once FC3 is released?
Regards,
Hans
Hans de Goede wrote:
I've been using rawhide to keep my FC3 test uptodate as well, is there actually a seperate test tree, where?
http://testing.fedora.redhat.com
Carwyn
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:40 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:52:44AM -0400, Build System wrote:
Updated Packages:
Is this post-FC3 stuff or will (parts) appear in FC3 final?
rawhide is still pointed at the FC3 trunk... although that will probably change very soon
Jeremy
Perhaps an updated fedora-releases package with updated *.repo and rhn/sources files should be released before the switch. That's if the switch will occur before FC3 final is released.
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Build System -
Carwyn Edwards -
Daniel Roesen -
David Malcolm -
Demond -
Frank Schmitt -
Hans de Goede -
Jeremy Katz -
Nils Philippsen