Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel. So people should be able to start rebuilding packages to include ppc64 as well as the other arches. There's a few wrinkles to watch out for:
1) Packages with dependencies will have to be built in dependency order. For instance, a lot of packages depend on the gtk-sharp2 bindings and those haven't been built yet.
2) Because of the imminent release of F11 we're in a freeze state. This means getting dependencies into the Fedora11 buildroot will require people to request tagging explicitly. This also means that if you rebuild your package for F11 with ppc64 support and later you have to get this package tagged into the release, all of the packages it depends on will need to be tagged in as well (otherwise your ppc64 build will have broken deps).
With these in mind, I'd recommend people start rebuilding their mono packages on ppc64 in the devel branch. Keep track of the dependency chain you encounter. Then perform your builds in the Fedora 11 branch as updates after the release. I'm not a mono-sig member, though, so if you guys decide something else makes sense, just be sure to come up with a plan so we don't release with a bunch of broken dependencies.
-Toshio
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel. So people should be able to start rebuilding packages to include ppc64 as well as the other arches. There's a few wrinkles to watch out for:
- Packages with dependencies will have to be built in dependency order.
For instance, a lot of packages depend on the gtk-sharp2 bindings and those haven't been built yet.
- Because of the imminent release of F11 we're in a freeze state. This
means getting dependencies into the Fedora11 buildroot will require people to request tagging explicitly. This also means that if you rebuild your package for F11 with ppc64 support and later you have to get this package tagged into the release, all of the packages it depends on will need to be tagged in as well (otherwise your ppc64 build will have broken deps).
With these in mind, I'd recommend people start rebuilding their mono packages on ppc64 in the devel branch. Keep track of the dependency chain you encounter. Then perform your builds in the Fedora 11 branch as updates after the release. I'm not a mono-sig member, though, so if you guys decide something else makes sense, just be sure to come up with a plan so we don't release with a bunch of broken dependencies.
-Toshio
It has been a month. For some reason, gtk-sharp2 and gnome-sharp are not rebuilt with ppc64 support yet. We will only have a very limited time to rebuild all the depending packages for F-11. It would only take a few minutes to rebuild gtk-sharp2 and gnome-sharp for their maintainers.
Why are these things left to the last minute?
Orcan
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.badger@gmail.com wrote:
Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel. So people should be able to start rebuilding packages to include ppc64 as well as the other arches. There's a few wrinkles to watch out for:
- Packages with dependencies will have to be built in dependency order.
For instance, a lot of packages depend on the gtk-sharp2 bindings and those haven't been built yet.
- Because of the imminent release of F11 we're in a freeze state. This
means getting dependencies into the Fedora11 buildroot will require people to request tagging explicitly. This also means that if you rebuild your package for F11 with ppc64 support and later you have to get this package tagged into the release, all of the packages it depends on will need to be tagged in as well (otherwise your ppc64 build will have broken deps).
With these in mind, I'd recommend people start rebuilding their mono packages on ppc64 in the devel branch. Keep track of the dependency chain you encounter. Then perform your builds in the Fedora 11 branch as updates after the release. I'm not a mono-sig member, though, so if you guys decide something else makes sense, just be sure to come up with a plan so we don't release with a bunch of broken dependencies.
-Toshio
gtk-sharp2 has been built for ppc64 and tag has been requested. other packages will be rebuild once gtk-sharp2 tagged.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Xavier Lamien laxathom@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.badger@gmail.com wrote:
Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel. So people should be able to start rebuilding packages to include ppc64 as well as the other arches. There's a few wrinkles to watch out for:
- Packages with dependencies will have to be built in dependency order.
For instance, a lot of packages depend on the gtk-sharp2 bindings and those haven't been built yet.
- Because of the imminent release of F11 we're in a freeze state. This
means getting dependencies into the Fedora11 buildroot will require people to request tagging explicitly. This also means that if you rebuild your package for F11 with ppc64 support and later you have to get this package tagged into the release, all of the packages it depends on will need to be tagged in as well (otherwise your ppc64 build will have broken deps).
With these in mind, I'd recommend people start rebuilding their mono packages on ppc64 in the devel branch. Keep track of the dependency chain you encounter. Then perform your builds in the Fedora 11 branch as updates after the release. I'm not a mono-sig member, though, so if you guys decide something else makes sense, just be sure to come up with a plan so we don't release with a bunch of broken dependencies.
-Toshio
gtk-sharp2 has been built for ppc64 and tag has been requested. other packages will be rebuild once gtk-sharp2 tagged.
Heads up,
gtk-sharp2 has been tagged and the following packages has been rebuilt for ppc64 availability. The list is a bit short for now as many of them need gnome-sharp (tag requested)
---------- gnome-sharp-2_24_0-4_fc11 gtksourceview2-sharp-1_0-5_svn89788_3_fc11 gecko-sharp2-0_13-3_fc11 webkit-sharp-0_2-2_fc11 monosim-1_3_0_2-3_fc11 avahi-0_6_25-2_fc11 (including sub-packages) mono-addins-0_4-7_20091702svn127062_1_fc11 gmime-2_4_3-5_fc11 bless-0_6_0-3_fc11 dbus-sharp-0_63-12_fc11 themonospot-0_7_1_1-3_fc11
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.badger@gmail.com wrote:
Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel. So people should be able to start rebuilding packages to include ppc64 as well as the other arches. There's a few wrinkles to watch out for:
- Packages with dependencies will have to be built in dependency order.
For instance, a lot of packages depend on the gtk-sharp2 bindings and those haven't been built yet.
- Because of the imminent release of F11 we're in a freeze state. This
means getting dependencies into the Fedora11 buildroot will require people to request tagging explicitly. This also means that if you rebuild your package for F11 with ppc64 support and later you have to get this package tagged into the release, all of the packages it depends on will need to be tagged in as well (otherwise your ppc64 build will have broken deps).
With these in mind, I'd recommend people start rebuilding their mono packages on ppc64 in the devel branch. Keep track of the dependency chain you encounter. Then perform your builds in the Fedora 11 branch as updates after the release. I'm not a mono-sig member, though, so if you guys decide something else makes sense, just be sure to come up with a plan so we don't release with a bunch of broken dependencies.
Sound like I forgot to update this thread. Well, All packages which should depend on gtk-sharp2 and gnome-sharp has been rebuilt (list below). If i missed some please, step up or feel free to build them if you have Acls.
list ---- gnome-sharp-2_24_0-4_fc11 gtksourceview2-sharp-1_0-5_svn89788_3_fc11 gecko-sharp2-0_13-3_fc11 webkit-sharp-0_2-2_fc11 monosim-1_3_0_2-3_fc11 avahi-0_6_25-2_fc11 mono-addins-0_4-7_20091702svn127062_1_fc11 gmime-2_4_3-5_fc11 bless-0_6_0-3_fc11 dbus-sharp-0_63-12_fc11 themonospot-0_7_1_1-3_fc11
ndesk-dbus-0_6_1a-5_fc11 gnome-subtitles-0_8-8_fc11 gnome-desktop-sharp-2_26_0-3_fc11 evolution-sharp-0_20_0-2_fc11 lat-1_2_3-7_fc11 gsf-sharp-0_8_1-10_fc11 mono-tools-2.4-9.fc11 bareftp-0:0.2.2-2.fc10.i386 gtk-sharp-1_0_10-23_fc11 ndesk-dbus-glib-0_4_1-5_fc11
beagle-0.3.9-8.fc11 notify-sharp-0.4.0-0.7.20080912svn.fc11 gnome-keyring-sharp-1.0.1-0.3.115768svn.fc11 podsleuth-0.6.3-3.fc11 tasque-0.1.8-3.fc11 tomboy muine f-spot
ipod-sharp-0.8.1-3.fc11 mono-zeroconf-0.7.6-9.fc11 gnome-do-0.8.1.3-6.fc11 giver-0.1.8-5.fc11 gbrainy-1.1-4.fc11
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:28 PM, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel. So people should be able to start rebuilding packages to include ppc64 as well as the other arches. There's a few wrinkles to watch out for:
- Packages with dependencies will have to be built in dependency order.
For instance, a lot of packages depend on the gtk-sharp2 bindings and those haven't been built yet.
- Because of the imminent release of F11 we're in a freeze state. This
means getting dependencies into the Fedora11 buildroot will require people to request tagging explicitly. This also means that if you rebuild your package for F11 with ppc64 support and later you have to get this package tagged into the release, all of the packages it depends on will need to be tagged in as well (otherwise your ppc64 build will have broken deps).
With these in mind, I'd recommend people start rebuilding their mono packages on ppc64 in the devel branch. Keep track of the dependency chain you encounter. Then perform your builds in the Fedora 11 branch as updates after the release. I'm not a mono-sig member, though, so if you guys decide something else makes sense, just be sure to come up with a plan so we don't release with a bunch of broken dependencies.
Sound like I forgot to update this thread. Well, All packages which should depend on gtk-sharp2 and gnome-sharp has been rebuilt (list below). If i missed some please, step up or feel free to build them if you have Acls.
list
gnome-sharp-2_24_0-4_fc11 gtksourceview2-sharp-1_0-5_svn89788_3_fc11 gecko-sharp2-0_13-3_fc11 webkit-sharp-0_2-2_fc11 monosim-1_3_0_2-3_fc11 avahi-0_6_25-2_fc11 mono-addins-0_4-7_20091702svn127062_1_fc11 gmime-2_4_3-5_fc11 bless-0_6_0-3_fc11 dbus-sharp-0_63-12_fc11 themonospot-0_7_1_1-3_fc11
ndesk-dbus-0_6_1a-5_fc11 gnome-subtitles-0_8-8_fc11 gnome-desktop-sharp-2_26_0-3_fc11 evolution-sharp-0_20_0-2_fc11 lat-1_2_3-7_fc11 gsf-sharp-0_8_1-10_fc11 mono-tools-2.4-9.fc11 bareftp-0:0.2.2-2.fc10.i386 gtk-sharp-1_0_10-23_fc11 ndesk-dbus-glib-0_4_1-5_fc11
beagle-0.3.9-8.fc11 notify-sharp-0.4.0-0.7.20080912svn.fc11 gnome-keyring-sharp-1.0.1-0.3.115768svn.fc11 podsleuth-0.6.3-3.fc11 tasque-0.1.8-3.fc11 tomboy muine f-spot
ipod-sharp-0.8.1-3.fc11 mono-zeroconf-0.7.6-9.fc11 gnome-do-0.8.1.3-6.fc11 giver-0.1.8-5.fc11 gbrainy-1.1-4.fc11
gnome-guitar is missing which I rebuilt a while ago (before your email).
I just saw that the new gnome-sharp and gtk-sharp2 is not in F-11 repos although they were in the buildroot override. This caused dependency breakage. I also can't find them on bodhi. What is going on?
Orcan
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Orcan Ogetbiloget.fedora@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:28 PM, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel. So people should be able to start rebuilding packages to include ppc64 as well as the other arches. There's a few wrinkles to watch out for:
- Packages with dependencies will have to be built in dependency order.
For instance, a lot of packages depend on the gtk-sharp2 bindings and those haven't been built yet.
- Because of the imminent release of F11 we're in a freeze state. This
means getting dependencies into the Fedora11 buildroot will require people to request tagging explicitly. This also means that if you rebuild your package for F11 with ppc64 support and later you have to get this package tagged into the release, all of the packages it depends on will need to be tagged in as well (otherwise your ppc64 build will have broken deps).
With these in mind, I'd recommend people start rebuilding their mono packages on ppc64 in the devel branch. Keep track of the dependency chain you encounter. Then perform your builds in the Fedora 11 branch as updates after the release. I'm not a mono-sig member, though, so if you guys decide something else makes sense, just be sure to come up with a plan so we don't release with a bunch of broken dependencies.
Sound like I forgot to update this thread. Well, All packages which should depend on gtk-sharp2 and gnome-sharp has been rebuilt (list below). If i missed some please, step up or feel free to build them if you have Acls.
list
gnome-sharp-2_24_0-4_fc11 gtksourceview2-sharp-1_0-5_svn89788_3_fc11 gecko-sharp2-0_13-3_fc11 webkit-sharp-0_2-2_fc11 monosim-1_3_0_2-3_fc11 avahi-0_6_25-2_fc11 mono-addins-0_4-7_20091702svn127062_1_fc11 gmime-2_4_3-5_fc11 bless-0_6_0-3_fc11 dbus-sharp-0_63-12_fc11 themonospot-0_7_1_1-3_fc11
ndesk-dbus-0_6_1a-5_fc11 gnome-subtitles-0_8-8_fc11 gnome-desktop-sharp-2_26_0-3_fc11 evolution-sharp-0_20_0-2_fc11 lat-1_2_3-7_fc11 gsf-sharp-0_8_1-10_fc11 mono-tools-2.4-9.fc11 bareftp-0:0.2.2-2.fc10.i386 gtk-sharp-1_0_10-23_fc11 ndesk-dbus-glib-0_4_1-5_fc11
beagle-0.3.9-8.fc11 notify-sharp-0.4.0-0.7.20080912svn.fc11 gnome-keyring-sharp-1.0.1-0.3.115768svn.fc11 podsleuth-0.6.3-3.fc11 tasque-0.1.8-3.fc11 tomboy muine f-spot
ipod-sharp-0.8.1-3.fc11 mono-zeroconf-0.7.6-9.fc11 gnome-do-0.8.1.3-6.fc11 giver-0.1.8-5.fc11 gbrainy-1.1-4.fc11
gnome-guitar is missing which I rebuilt a while ago (before your email).
I just saw that the new gnome-sharp and gtk-sharp2 is not in F-11 repos although they were in the buildroot override. This caused dependency breakage. I also can't find them on bodhi. What is going on?
I assume that no one have any mono packages to rebuilt. then if so, i gonna request a push above packages.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
I assume that no one have any mono packages to rebuilt. then if so, i gonna request a push above packages.
Please do. This was F11-Target and I didn't even think this would not be submitted ASAP and I had pushed gnome-guitar to updates. Now it is sitting there alone.
Orcan
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:11:33 +0200, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
list
I assume that no one have any mono packages to rebuilt. then if so, i gonna request a push above packages.
Are F-11 and devel in sync? It seems you have not built any of these changes for devel (.fc12).
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Michael Schwendtmschwendt@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:11:33 +0200, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
list
I assume that no one have any mono packages to rebuilt. then if so, i gonna request a push above packages.
Are F-11 and devel in sync? It seems you have not built any of these changes for devel (.fc12).
I did, on some packages already (eg. gtk-sharp2, gnome-sharp). the rest are on their ways If you have package to rebuild, feel free to do it
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Michael Schwendt -
Orcan Ogetbil -
SmootherFrOgZ -
Toshio Kuratomi -
Xavier Lamien