ATM we have gstreamer-0.10.3-3 gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.3-3 gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.2-1
It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is: gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5 (see thread http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00126.html and for previous related messages: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-multimedia/2006-March/msg00000.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-multimedia/2006-March/msg00002.html ) and gst-plugins-good-0.10.2 What is the plan for final fc5 about core and base? Are they planned to be aligned with gnome? Thanks Gianluca
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of the FC5 release.
Do you know if there is any plan to update libnotify to 0.3.2 for FC5? I've got a couple of packages (gossip, xchat-gnome) that don't work with 0.3.0 due to the api change.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179960
/B
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of the FC5 release.
Do you know if there is any plan to update libnotify to 0.3.2 for FC5? I've got a couple of packages (gossip, xchat-gnome) that don't work with 0.3.0 due to the api change.
It was considered, but it requires the new notification daemon, and the new notification daemon requires libsexy which we don't ship. At the time, it was a bit late in the development cycle to add a new package to the distribution.
If you file a bug though, maybe we can do something. For instance, make libsexy configure time optional or something. Hard to say at this point.
--Ray
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:47 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of the FC5 release.
Do you know if there is any plan to update libnotify to 0.3.2 for FC5? I've got a couple of packages (gossip, xchat-gnome) that don't work with 0.3.0 due to the api change.
It was considered, but it requires the new notification daemon, and the new notification daemon requires libsexy which we don't ship. At the time, it was a bit late in the development cycle to add a new package to the distribution.
If you file a bug though, maybe we can do something. For instance, make libsexy configure time optional or something. Hard to say at this point.
Ray, thanks for the update. I glanced at the latest notification daemon tarball, and it looks fairly straight forward to make the libsexy dependency option. The only use of libsexy is in the theme.c file, and it involves sexy-url-label. If I've got some time this weekend, I'll work on a patch to make libsexy option.
/B
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
Hi,
It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is: gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of the FC5 release.
I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions, except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Thanks Thomas
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 22:22 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is: gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of the FC5 release.
I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions, except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Not everything got upgraded. It was basically a matter of looking at diffs and trying to decide what was "safe". I don't think that anyone is 100% happy with how that process went.
The plan is definitely to get the rest of the 2.14 final packages out as an update ASAP after Monday and there's also going to be an effort to actually track the stable releases as they're done this time around :-)
Jeremy
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 16:28 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 22:22 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is: gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of the FC5 release.
I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions, except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Not everything got upgraded. It was basically a matter of looking at diffs and trying to decide what was "safe". I don't think that anyone is 100% happy with how that process went.
The plan is definitely to get the rest of the 2.14 final packages out as an update ASAP after Monday and there's also going to be an effort to actually track the stable releases as they're done this time around :-)
They (remaining 2.14 pieces) are already queued for updates.
On 3/16/06, Jeremy Katz katzj@redhat.com wrote:
Not everything got upgraded. It was basically a matter of looking at diffs and trying to decide what was "safe". I don't think that anyone is 100% happy with how that process went.
The plan is definitely to get the rest of the 2.14 final packages out as an update ASAP after Monday and there's also going to be an effort to actually track the stable releases as they're done this time around :-)
Thank you for giving me yet another excuse to sit on the patches to make istanbul in Extras build on 64bit. Now that i know the new gst is going to be updated asap... makes working on gst08 istanbul package this weekend particularly pointless when I'll be able to finally roll a gst 0.10 with the gst update.
-jef
Hi Jeremy,
El jue, 16-03-2006 a las 16:28 -0500, Jeremy Katz escribió:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 22:22 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is: gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of the FC5 release.
I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions, except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Not everything got upgraded. It was basically a matter of looking at diffs and trying to decide what was "safe". I don't think that anyone is 100% happy with how that process went.
The plan is definitely to get the rest of the 2.14 final packages out as an update ASAP after Monday and there's also going to be an effort to actually track the stable releases as they're done this time around :-)
Is this still the plan? are there going to be updates for new releases of Gnome 2.14.x??
Cheers,
-William
__________________________________________________ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam �gratis! Reg�strate ya - http://correo.yahoo.com.mx/
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 09:05 -0500, William Lovaton wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
El jue, 16-03-2006 a las 16:28 -0500, Jeremy Katz escribió:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 22:22 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:44 -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
It seems in final gnome 2.14 the optimum is: gstreamer 0.10.4 and gst-plugins-base 0.10.5
I believe the plan is to upgrade in FC5 updates, within a few days of the FC5 release.
I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions, except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Not everything got upgraded. It was basically a matter of looking at diffs and trying to decide what was "safe". I don't think that anyone is 100% happy with how that process went.
The plan is definitely to get the rest of the 2.14 final packages out as an update ASAP after Monday and there's also going to be an effort to actually track the stable releases as they're done this time around :-)
Is this still the plan? are there going to be updates for new releases of Gnome 2.14.x??
updates have already been pushed into fedora updates-testing repository.
Rahul
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:22:13PM +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
I asked around and I didn't really get an answer on how come everything that is in GNOME's release got upgraded to the actual released versions, except GStreamer. Any logic to that ? Can someone shed some light ?
Among other things, GStreamer was not subject to the rigorous freezes that the rest of GNOME was. It's developed in a more independent fashion. Hence, the difference between the 2.13.9x GNOME releases and 2.14 was much smaller and safer, compared to the difference in GStreamer. You know that, of course, based on the fact that you started this thread on GNOME's release-team mailing list: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00126.html
John Thacker
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Brian Pepple -
Gianluca Cecchi -
Jef Spaleta -
Jeremy Katz -
John Thacker -
Matthias Clasen -
Rahul Sundaram -
Ray Strode -
Thomas Vander Stichele -
William Lovaton