Hi,
it is too late to have FDS be part of FC5, isn't it? Is anyone working on pushing a package into rawhide anyway?
Thanks.
Le dimanche 04 décembre 2005 à 15:41 +0100, Axel Thimm a écrit :
Hi,
it is too late to have FDS be part of FC5, isn't it? Is anyone working on pushing a package into rawhide anyway?
Have the SUN jvm bits been cleaned up yet or is it still depending on sun's java plugin ?
Regards,
Once upon a time Sunday 04 December 2005 8:45 am, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le dimanche 04 décembre 2005 à 15:41 +0100, Axel Thimm a écrit :
Hi,
it is too late to have FDS be part of FC5, isn't it? Is anyone working on pushing a package into rawhide anyway?
Have the SUN jvm bits been cleaned up yet or is it still depending on sun's java plugin ?
Regards,
Its not requiring suns jvm in particular but the docs indicate that it needs sun's or IBM's JVM 1.4.2 so it would probably work with blackdown's also. but i dont think it will work with gcc's java yet
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 10:16 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Its not requiring suns jvm in particular but the docs indicate that it needs sun's or IBM's JVM 1.4.2 so it would probably work with blackdown's also. but i dont think it will work with gcc's java yet
My understanding is that as of a couple of weeks ago GNU Classpath has all the patches we need to run FDS well (thanks to Lillian Angel).
So having FDS run on our free stack in Fedora depends on FC5 moving over to GCC 4.1 and making sure it has Lillian's latest fixes.
AG
Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,
it is too late to have FDS be part of FC5, isn't it? Is anyone working on pushing a package into rawhide anyway?
It probably needs more work before getting into FC. Maybe FC6.
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 22:13 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,
it is too late to have FDS be part of FC5, isn't it? Is anyone working on pushing a package into rawhide anyway?
It probably needs more work before getting into FC. Maybe FC6.
Doesn't it still need a non-free java?
Richard.
"Richard" == Richard Hughes hughsient@gmail.com writes:
It probably needs more work before getting into FC. Maybe FC6.
Richard> Doesn't it still need a non-free java?
Lillian did a lot of work to make these tools work on Classpath. My understanding is that they work but that there are still some minor GUI issues -- swing is still the rawest part of the class library.
I don't think anybody has tried them with gcj 4.1 yet.
Tom
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org