Hello,
Based on some discussions held here, but also in the closed sponsor list, and based on the first practical cases of provenpackager sponsoring, some updates have been done to the wiki.
Please comment!
After the comments, maybe FESCo should verify that everything is conform to the intended policies.
Main provenpackager description is now at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#...
How to sponsor a provenpackager is explained here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor#Sponsoring_p...
And the policy regarding who is allowed to modify which package has been modified to take into account that provenpackagers are the one who can do that now https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages
Regarding sponsors, there has been some changes to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor#Becoming_a_F...
and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_sponsor_responsibilities
-- Pat
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:40 +0200 Patrice Dumas pertusus@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
Based on some discussions held here, but also in the closed sponsor list, and based on the first practical cases of provenpackager sponsoring, some updates have been done to the wiki.
Please comment!
After the comments, maybe FESCo should verify that everything is conform to the intended policies.
I think thats a fine idea.
Main provenpackager description is now at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#...
This looks good to me.
How to sponsor a provenpackager is explained here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor#Sponsoring_p...
Not sure this belongs there, but I'm not sure I can think of a better place. :) Since it's FESCo who sponsors provenpackagers, perhaps it should be under a FESCo page? Or it can't hurt to be there I guess.
And the policy regarding who is allowed to modify which package has been modified to take into account that provenpackagers are the one who can do that now https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages
ok.
Regarding sponsors, there has been some changes to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor#Becoming_a_F...
and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_sponsor_responsibilities
Looks good... the "NOTE: the current ACL system does not allow this. Hopefully it will be fixed." note probibly can be removed. Since sponsors are in provenpackager they should be able to modify their sponsorees packages now.
Pat
kevin
On 03/30/2009 01:01 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Hello,
Based on some discussions held here, but also in the closed sponsor list, and based on the first practical cases of provenpackager sponsoring, some updates have been done to the wiki.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy probably needs updating as well, or at least links sprinkled around it...
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:58:25PM -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy probably needs updating as well, or at least links sprinkled around it...
I merged it in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#P... so I think that it could just be archived.
-- Pat
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:01:40PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Main provenpackager description is now at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#...
I think that the text of that is right, but nothing in the title of the page helps finding out that the provenpackager role and sponsoring process is described here. Maybe Provenpackagers should have a separate top-level policy page in the wiki?
-- Pat
On 03/31/2009 12:36 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:01:40PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Main provenpackager description is now at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#...
I think that the text of that is right, but nothing in the title of the page helps finding out that the provenpackager role and sponsoring process is described here. Maybe Provenpackagers should have a separate top-level policy page in the wiki?
Um, see the prior link I sent that you wanted to archive...
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 06:54:05AM -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 03/31/2009 12:36 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:01:40PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Main provenpackager description is now at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#...
I think that the text of that is right, but nothing in the title of the page helps finding out that the provenpackager role and sponsoring process is described here. Maybe Provenpackagers should have a separate top-level policy page in the wiki?
Um, see the prior link I sent that you wanted to archive...
;-). Good idea, that looks like a better place for the whole provenpackager stuff. I'll put the text there certainly tonight, unless somebody do it before, and then How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Provenpackagers will only redirect to that page.
-- Pat
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:47:12PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Um, see the prior link I sent that you wanted to archive...
Now everything is in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy
and I changed accordingly https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
Thanks, Christofer.
I think that FESCo could review what the Provenpackager_policy page looks like now.
-- Pat
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org