Could someone with enough karma rebuild krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13 (this is in relation to bug #597669). The 0.15 is leaking memory like there is no tomorrow and I'm not getting much traction from the assignee of the bug...
TIA,
Bojan Smojver <bojan <at> rexursive.com> writes:
Could someone with enough karma rebuild krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13 (this is in relation to bug #597669). The 0.15 is leaking memory like there is no tomorrow and I'm not getting much traction from the assignee of the bug...
Thank you! (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=183791)
-- Bojan
Bojan Smojver <bojan <at> rexursive.com> writes:
Bojan Smojver <bojan <at> rexursive.com> writes:
Could someone with enough karma rebuild krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13 (this is in relation to bug #597669). The 0.15 is leaking memory like there is no tomorrow and I'm not getting much traction from the assignee of the bug...
Thank you! (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=183791)
Tested and leaks appear to have been fixed. So, ready for updates.
-- Bojan
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:29 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Could someone with enough karma rebuild krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13 (this is in relation to bug #597669). The 0.15 is leaking memory like there is no tomorrow and I'm not getting much traction from the assignee of the bug...
Been running 0.16 from Koji for a while now. No signs of trouble. Can this be queued up for F-13 updates, so that other folks get the goodies?
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Bojan Smojver bojan@rexursive.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:29 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Could someone with enough karma rebuild krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13 (this is in relation to bug #597669). The 0.15 is leaking memory like there is no tomorrow and I'm not getting much traction from the assignee of the bug...
Been running 0.16 from Koji for a while now. No signs of trouble. Can this be queued up for F-13 updates, so that other folks get the goodies?
I just saw this new build is installing .a and .la files. If .a files are needed then -static subpackage should be created and .la files must not be packaged.
Parag.
Parag N(पराग़ <panemade <at> gmail.com> writes:
I just saw this new build is installing .a and .la files. If .a files are needed then -static subpackage should be created and .la files must not be packaged.
I'm guessing you are referring to the libka-plugin-dummy stuff. I would venture a guess that these can be simply hosed, because plugins usually require .so only to function.
PS. I'm not a package maintainer, so I cannot actually do that.
-- Bojan
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Bojan Smojver -
Parag Nemade