-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
Dennis
_______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
kevin
_______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
Is there a page with a list of the failed packages against owners?
Peter
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:28:28 +0100 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
Is there a page with a list of the failed packages against owners?
Yep: http://fedorapeople.org/~ausil/f18-failures.html
I'm not sure if it was updated before Dennis had to leave for the airport however.
kevin
On 07/22/2012 10:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:28:28 +0100 Peter Robinsonpbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Fenzikevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmoredennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
Is there a page with a list of the failed packages against owners?
Yep: http://fedorapeople.org/~ausil/f18-failures.html
I'm not sure if it was updated before Dennis had to leave for the airport however.
kevin
First time on this list; I try to handle adobe-source-libraries which failed. It's just I don't know what to do.
The build failed because recent gcc update revealed a bug in current boost. This bug is fixed in boost 1.50 which is scheduled for F18
OTOH, there are no boost 1.50 packages to test against; I don't even know if 1.50 will make it for F18.
The bugfix means API changes, so backporting to 1.48 is not an option IMHO.
Now, what do I do? Just sit down waiting for boost 1.50? Or?
--alec
On 07/22/2012 10:09 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
First time on this list; I try to handle adobe-source-libraries which failed. It's just I don't know what to do.
The build failed because recent gcc update revealed a bug in current boost. This bug is fixed in boost 1.50 which is scheduled for F18
OTOH, there are no boost 1.50 packages to test against; I don't even know if 1.50 will make it for F18.
The bugfix means API changes, so backporting to 1.48 is not an option IMHO.
Now, what do I do? Just sit down waiting for boost 1.50? Or?
--alec
Boost 1.50 is a candidate for Fedora Feature https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18Boost150
IIRC it was already approved (confirmed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/18/FeatureList).
On 07/24/2012 12:08 PM, José Matos wrote:
On 07/22/2012 10:09 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
First time on this list; I try to handle adobe-source-libraries which failed. It's just I don't know what to do.
The build failed because recent gcc update revealed a bug in current boost. This bug is fixed in boost 1.50 which is scheduled for F18
OTOH, there are no boost 1.50 packages to test against; I don't even know if 1.50 will make it for F18.
The bugfix means API changes, so backporting to 1.48 is not an option IMHO.
Now, what do I do? Just sit down waiting for boost 1.50? Or?
--alec
Boost 1.50 is a candidate for Fedora Feature https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18Boost150
IIRC it was already approved (confirmed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/18/FeatureList).
Tnanks for input. Since this is the only input I've got will wait for 1.50 - and just hope it will make it for F18. If not, I'm in deep troubles, but let's hope for the best
The bug: see https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1130928 and https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6940
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:28:28 +0100 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
Is there a page with a list of the failed packages against owners?
drago01 (1): hardinfo
-> fixed
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 14:33 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I've fixed diffutils and built it.
Tim. */
Fixed uim and linux-libertine-fonts.
Cheers,
----- 元のメッセージ ----- | On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:28:28 +0100 | Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote: | | > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com | > wrote: | > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 | > > Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote: | > > | > >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 | > >> that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for | > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and | > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a | > >> mix | > >> up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that | > >> only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on | > >> 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 | > >> | > >> This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved | > >> over when completed. We will be running scripts to output | > >> failure | > >> stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in | > >> the | > >> reporting. | > > | > > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, | > > they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. | > > | > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. | > > 656 packages failed to rebuild. | > > | > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. | > | > Is there a page with a list of the failed packages against owners? | | Yep: http://fedorapeople.org/~ausil/f18-failures.html | | I'm not sure if it was updated before Dennis had to leave for the | airport however. | | kevin | | | -- | devel mailing list | devel@lists.fedoraproject.org | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
Thanks for the notification. I fixed driftnet that failed to compile
* Sun Jul 22 2012 Paul Wouters pwouters@redhat.com - 0.1.6-25.20040426cvs - Change obsoleted libpng png_set_gray_1_2_4_to_8() to png_set_expand_gray_1_2_4_to_8()
Paul
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
Hello,
VirtualGL fails to build in rawhide due to bugzilla #839060.
I can try to rebuild that package as soon as that bug is fixed. I just tried now and its still failing due to libglapi being not linked against pthread. Sorry about that.
Thanks,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
I've fixed and rebuilt
* python-unidecode * python-migrate0.5
-Toshio
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
These are fixed: - hydrogen - lash
This one did not have any problems. Just a plain rebuild "fixed" it: - clementine
This one seems like a bug in doxygen, rather than a bug in the package: - slv2 [1] Apparently doxygen-1.8.1.1 generates a manpage file with a weird filename: /usr/share/man/man3/_builddir_build_BUILD_slv2-0.6.6_slv2_.3.gz
I also see that the same problem exists in a few other packages, e.g. sord [2], suil [3]. I imagine there are other ones suffering the same issue.
Downgrading to doxygen-1.8.0-1.fc18 eliminates the problem. Does anyone have a solution/workaround for this bug?
Thanks, Orcan
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4313333 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4313528 [3] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4314730
On 07/23/2012 03:47 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
These are fixed:
- hydrogen
- lash
This one did not have any problems. Just a plain rebuild "fixed" it:
- clementine
This one seems like a bug in doxygen, rather than a bug in the package:
- slv2 [1]
Apparently doxygen-1.8.1.1 generates a manpage file with a weird filename: /usr/share/man/man3/_builddir_build_BUILD_slv2-0.6.6_slv2_.3.gz
I also see that the same problem exists in a few other packages, e.g. sord [2], suil [3]. I imagine there are other ones suffering the same issue.
Downgrading to doxygen-1.8.0-1.fc18 eliminates the problem. Does anyone have a solution/workaround for this bug?
Hmmm, it seems to be generating a (new) index file which contains a reference to the header file and nothing else. Removing prior to the install step seems to be enough an easy enough fix, but there is probably a better way that we can send upstream
Brendan
SIR (Simple Image Resizer) issue now also fixed:
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4323741
Thanks for notification.
Hey,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 02:21:10PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
GNOME Boxes failed to build because of libvirt-client is a BuildRequires, and this package cannot be installed because of recent netcat changes in rawhide. Should we work on getting a working GNOME Boxes rebuild as soon as possible, or can it wait until the next release (which is due in a few weeks)?
Christophe
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Christophe Fergeau cfergeau@redhat.com wrote:
Hey,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 02:21:10PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
GNOME Boxes failed to build because of libvirt-client is a BuildRequires, and this package cannot be installed because of recent netcat changes in rawhide. Should we work on getting a working GNOME Boxes rebuild as soon as possible, or can it wait until the next release (which is due in a few weeks)?
If there's a fix in the works I would suggest just waiting, as long as it's fixed and is being tracked it shouldn't be too much of a problem. It's the couple of hundred other packages that are long term FTBFS that really need their maintainers to apply attention :)
Peter
Le dimanche 22 juillet 2012 à 14:21 -0600, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
kevin _______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
The D compiler ldc is successful rebuild now. The build failed because ldc use LLVM and now we have LLVM 3.1 \o/
On 07/22/2012 10:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
Fixed and rebuilt libsolv: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4322484
Ales
----- Original Message -----
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
qtcurve-kde4 currently blocked by bug 831958, kde 4.8.90+ api changes, upstream restored some parts of old api but seems not all, looking on the issue.
I'm not sure we want to maintain contextkit and libqttracker anymore, any users? Or someone who would like to take care about it? It's the leftover after MeeGo fail (but there's still Mer and new stuff built on top of it).
R.
kevin
devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild?
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:14:42 +0300 Alexander Bokovoy abokovoy@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild?
Odd. I don't know why it wasn't included...
Dennis is traveling today, but he can check scripts tomorrow and see what happened.
kevin
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:14:42 +0300 Alexander Bokovoy abokovoy@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild?
Odd. I don't know why it wasn't included...
Dennis is traveling today, but he can check scripts tomorrow and see what happened.
I'm working on a rebuild myself, as adopting to samba4 beta4 will require small patch (thus I was surprised to not see failure).
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:14:42 +0300 Alexander Bokovoy abokovoy@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild?
Odd. I don't know why it wasn't included...
Dennis is traveling today, but he can check scripts tomorrow and see what happened.
I made a rebuild for freeipa. However, please do check if any other package was missed as well.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:14:42PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild?
If a build has been submitted for freeipa "since koji changes went live" (whatever that means) then the scripts wouldn't have submitted another one. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild#Build_Initiation
and:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11554
(looks like freeipa has been built twice since the beginning of July).
Rich.
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:14:42PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild?
If a build has been submitted for freeipa "since koji changes went live" (whatever that means) then the scripts wouldn't have submitted another one. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild#Build_Initiation
and:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11554
(looks like freeipa has been built twice since the beginning of July).
The second rebuild is what I just did today.
From my reading of the rebuild ticket anything built before 2012-07-09 was supposed to be rebuild.
Le dimanche 22 juillet 2012 à 14:21 -0600, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
kevin _______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
The D compiler ldc is successful rebuild now. The build failed because ldc use LLVM and now we have LLVM 3.1 \o/
Dne 22.7.2012 22:21, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
ruby rubygem-eventmachine rubygem-net-scp rubygem-oauth rubygem-delayed_job rubygem-tilt
Rebuilt.
Vit
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
Fixed libmng. Still working on gnome-phone-manager.
-J
kevin
devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
I orphaned gtkpod. Hopefully chkr can pick that up. He's been effectively maintaining it for a while now. I don't use an iPod or Apple stuff anymore, so I have no need for gtkpod and nor time and ability to test it.
On 07/22/2012 09:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
I've fixed and rebuilt
python-sqlalchemy0.7
cheers, Pádraig.
Hi,
can someone tell me what is wrong with wyrd?
build.log says (http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8809/4318809/build.log): | ocaml version is 4.00.0+beta2 | ocaml library path is /usr/lib/ocaml | configure: error: Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater.
The configure scripts uses the following code:
1781 # we extract Ocaml version number and library path 1782 OCAMLVERSION=`$OCAMLC -v | sed -n -e 's|.*version *(.*)$|\1|p' ` 1783 echo "ocaml version is $OCAMLVERSION" 1784 OCAMLLIB=`$OCAMLC -v | tail -n 1 | cut -f 4 -d " "` 1785 echo "ocaml library path is $OCAMLLIB" 1786 1787 1788 # check for sufficient OCAMLVERSION 1789 OCAMLMAJORVERSION=`echo $OCAMLVERSION | cut -d '.' -f 1` 1790 OCAMLMINORVERSION=`echo $OCAMLVERSION | cut -d '.' -f 2` 1791 if test $OCAMLMAJORVERSION -lt 3 ; then 1792 as_fn_error "Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater." "$LINENO" 5 1793 else 1794 if test $OCAMLMINORVERSION -lt 8 ; then 1795 as_fn_error "Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater." "$LINENO" 5 1796 fi 1797 fi
As far as I can see it should test in line 1791 whether 4 is less than 3, which is not the case and therefore it should not fail.
If you know how to fix this, you are welcome to fix it directly in the git repo. :-)
Regards Till
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:01:48 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
can someone tell me what is wrong with wyrd?
build.log says (http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8809/4318809/build.log): | ocaml version is 4.00.0+beta2 | ocaml library path is /usr/lib/ocaml | configure: error: Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater.
The configure scripts uses the following code:
1781 # we extract Ocaml version number and library path 1782 OCAMLVERSION=`$OCAMLC -v | sed -n -e 's|.*version *(.*)$|\1|p' ` 1783 echo "ocaml version is $OCAMLVERSION" 1784 OCAMLLIB=`$OCAMLC -v | tail -n 1 | cut -f 4 -d " "` 1785 echo "ocaml library path is $OCAMLLIB" 1786 1787 1788 # check for sufficient OCAMLVERSION 1789 OCAMLMAJORVERSION=`echo $OCAMLVERSION | cut -d '.' -f 1` 1790 OCAMLMINORVERSION=`echo $OCAMLVERSION | cut -d '.' -f 2` 1791 if test $OCAMLMAJORVERSION -lt 3 ; then 1792 as_fn_error "Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater." "$LINENO" 5 1793 else 1794 if test $OCAMLMINORVERSION -lt 8 ; then 1795 as_fn_error "Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater." "$LINENO" 5 1796 fi 1797 fi
As far as I can see it should test in line 1791 whether 4 is less than 3, which is not the case and therefore it should not fail.
If you know how to fix this, you are welcome to fix it directly in the git repo. :-)
Hint: Focus on line 1794.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 02:21:10PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
kevin
Fixed and built so far (automake issues):
fcoe-utils libhbaapi libhbalinux lldpad
-P
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
El Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:21:10 -0600 Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com escribió:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
kevin
http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-failures.html http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-needsbuilt.html are the lists of whats failed and what needs building yet. I'll update them a few times a day.
Dennis
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
How is this list generated? It claims vbetool needs rebuilding, but vbetool has been deadpackaged.
- ajax
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Adam Jackson ajax@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
How is this list generated? It claims vbetool needs rebuilding, but vbetool has been deadpackaged.
It's not been blocked from F18+ by rel-eng though according to koji
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4988
There should be an f18 in the tags down the bottom with a red minus.
Peter
On 07/25/2012 06:03 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
How is this list generated? It claims vbetool needs rebuilding, but vbetool has been deadpackaged.
- ajax
I found different problem. My packages at and cronie weren't build, there is no changelog about mass rebuild in their git. It looks like the list of packages for rebuild is not complete or something failed during mass rebuild.
Marcela
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:09:12PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 07/25/2012 06:03 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
I found different problem. My packages at and cronie weren't build, there is no changelog about mass rebuild in their git. It looks like the list of packages for rebuild is not complete or something failed during mass rebuild.
The script seems to be buggy. The rebuild of fwbuilder was also not catched (it happened on Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:51:52 UTC and was still reported on 2012-07-25 00:30:38.680350 UTC).
Regards Till
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:03:46 -0400 Adam Jackson ajax@redhat.com escribió:
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
How is this list generated? It claims vbetool needs rebuilding, but vbetool has been deadpackaged.
- ajax
http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/need-rebuild.py
did you follow the full eol procedure as defined http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life just making it dead.package in git is not enough.
Dennis
On 7/26/12 3:25 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:03:46 -0400 Adam Jackson ajax@redhat.com escribió:
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
How is this list generated? It claims vbetool needs rebuilding, but vbetool has been deadpackaged.
- ajax
http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/need-rebuild.py
did you follow the full eol procedure as defined http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life just making it dead.package in git is not enough.
I could have sworn I had, but releng trac disagrees, I seem to have stopped at the "mark retired in pkgdb" step. Fixing.
But that raises its own question, why is that not sufficient to get the package blocked? I mean, besides that the code currently doesn't implement that. Who would own hooking up that bit of pkgdb to that bit of the compose process?
- ajax
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:27:40AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
I could have sworn I had, but releng trac disagrees, I seem to have stopped at the "mark retired in pkgdb" step. Fixing.
But that raises its own question, why is that not sufficient to get the package blocked? I mean, besides that the code currently doesn't implement that. Who would own hooking up that bit of pkgdb to that bit of the compose process?
Dennis and I talked about this at FUDCon Blacksburg and Dennis outlined a plan for doing it in fedpkg. I think it's just waiting on enough time to finish/start coding it.
-Toshio
Dne 25.7.2012 18:03, Adam Jackson napsal(a):
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
How is this list generated? It claims vbetool needs rebuilding, but vbetool has been deadpackaged.
- ajax
On contrary, jruby is marked as orphaned where it is owned by mmorsi in pkgdb.
Vit
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
El Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:21:10 -0600 Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com escribió:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
kevin
http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-failures.html http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-needsbuilt.html are the lists of whats failed and what needs building yet. I'll update them a few times a day.
Why freeipa is on the list of needsbuilt? I rebuilt it on Monday already.
Hi, On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
El Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:21:10 -0600 Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com escribió:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
kevin
http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-failures.html http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f18-needsbuilt.html
I don't see iok ever failed to build and caribou has been already rebuilt but still above list has listed it. please update this list.
Regards, Parag.
Dne 22.7.2012 22:21, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18
This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting.
The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.
11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild.
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
rubygem-rails_warden rubygem-rspec-rails rubygem-shoulda rubygem-simple-navigation rubygem-will_paginate
Are rebuilt now.
Vit
Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.
findbugs failed to build (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=333451), but I've now fixed and rebuilt it (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=344787).
eclipse-findbugs rebuilt OK without any changes (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=333103).
Regards,
Rich
I'm seeing a few downgrades after the rebuild packages were tagged into rawhide. Were some updates missed and then replaced by packages from the rebuild that shouldn't have been?
Downgrading: GMT x86_64 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 1.7 M GMT-common noarch 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 4.1 M GMT-devel x86_64 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 83 k GMT-doc noarch 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 33 M GMT-static x86_64 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 542 k gmime x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 177 k gmime-devel x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 153 k gmime-sharp x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 37 k gwsmhg noarch 0.13-4.fc18 rawhide 252 k libmash x86_64 0.2.0-6.fc18 rawhide 46 k m17n-contrib noarch 1.1.13-4.fc18 rawhide 339 k m17n-contrib-extras noarch 1.1.13-4.fc18 rawhide 94 k mactel-boot x86_64 0.9-2.fc18 rawhide 15 k rapidsvn x86_64 0.12.0-5.fc18 rawhide 354 k setroubleshoot-plugins noarch 3.0.25-2.fc18 rawhide 301 k svncpp x86_64 0.12.0-5.fc18 rawhide 58 k
Hi, On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to wrote:
I'm seeing a few downgrades after the rebuild packages were tagged into rawhide. Were some updates missed and then replaced by packages from the rebuild that shouldn't have been?
Downgrading: GMT x86_64 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 1.7 M GMT-common noarch 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 4.1 M GMT-devel x86_64 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 83 k GMT-doc noarch 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 33 M GMT-static x86_64 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 542 k gmime x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 177 k gmime-devel x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 153 k gmime-sharp x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 37 k gwsmhg noarch 0.13-4.fc18 rawhide 252 k libmash x86_64 0.2.0-6.fc18 rawhide 46 k m17n-contrib noarch 1.1.13-4.fc18 rawhide 339 k m17n-contrib-extras noarch 1.1.13-4.fc18 rawhide 94 k mactel-boot x86_64 0.9-2.fc18 rawhide 15 k rapidsvn x86_64 0.12.0-5.fc18 rawhide 354 k setroubleshoot-plugins noarch 3.0.25-2.fc18 rawhide 301 k svncpp x86_64 0.12.0-5.fc18 rawhide 58 k
Seems I forgot to update master when updated f17 for m17n-contrib-1.1.13-4.fc17. Fixed now.
Parag.
On 07/24/2012 07:10 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'm seeing a few downgrades after the rebuild packages were tagged into rawhide. Were some updates missed and then replaced by packages from the rebuild that shouldn't have been?
Downgrading:
[...]
gmime x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 177 k gmime-devel x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 153 k gmime-sharp x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 37 k
Thanks, I've fixed these three.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:10:42 -0500 Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to escribió:
I'm seeing a few downgrades after the rebuild packages were tagged into rawhide. Were some updates missed and then replaced by packages from the rebuild that shouldn't have been?
Downgrading: GMT x86_64 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 1.7 M GMT-common noarch 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 4.1 M GMT-devel x86_64 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 83 k GMT-doc noarch 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 33 M GMT-static x86_64 4.5.7-4.fc18 rawhide 542 k gmime x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 177 k gmime-devel x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 153 k gmime-sharp x86_64 2.6.4-2.fc18 rawhide 37 k gwsmhg noarch 0.13-4.fc18 rawhide 252 k libmash x86_64 0.2.0-6.fc18 rawhide 46 k m17n-contrib noarch 1.1.13-4.fc18 rawhide 339 k m17n-contrib-extras noarch 1.1.13-4.fc18 rawhide 94 k mactel-boot x86_64 0.9-2.fc18 rawhide 15 k rapidsvn x86_64 0.12.0-5.fc18 rawhide 354 k setroubleshoot-plugins noarch 3.0.25-2.fc18 rawhide 301 k svncpp x86_64 0.12.0-5.fc18 rawhide 58 k
Most likely its due to the maintainers bumping f17 branch but not making sure that master is correct also. with build having only ever happened in f17 branch. Maintainers are responsible to make sure that they work in master first.
Dennis
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Jackson -
Akira TAGOH -
Alec Leamas -
Ales Kozumplik -
Alexander Bokovoy -
Brendan Jones -
Bruno Wolff III -
Christophe Fergeau -
Dennis Gilmore -
drago01 -
Gary Gatling -
Jaroslav Reznik -
Jon Ciesla -
Jonathan MERCIER -
José Abílio Matos -
Kalev Lember -
Kevin Fenzi -
Marcela Mašláňová -
Michael Schwendt -
Orcan Ogetbil -
Parag Nemade -
Paul Wouters -
Peter Robinson -
Petr Šabata -
Praveen Kumar -
Pádraig Brady -
Richard Fearn -
Richard W.M. Jones -
Till Maas -
Tim Waugh -
Todd Zullinger -
Toshio Kuratomi -
Vít Ondruch